Literature DB >> 19221199

Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

J Wang1, A W Santure.   

Abstract

Likelihood methods have been developed to partition individuals in a sample into sibling clusters using genetic marker data without parental information. Most of these methods assume either both sexes are monogamous to infer full sibships only or only one sex is polygamous to infer full sibships and paternal or maternal (but not both) half sibships. We extend our previous method to the more general case of both sexes being polygamous to infer full sibships, paternal half sibships, and maternal half sibships and to the case of a two-generation sample of individuals to infer parentage jointly with sibships. The extension not only expands enormously the scope of application of the method, but also increases its statistical power. The method is implemented for both diploid and haplodiploid species and for codominant and dominant markers, with mutations and genotyping errors accommodated. The performance and robustness of the method are evaluated by analyzing both simulated and empirical data sets. Our method is shown to be much more powerful than pairwise methods in both parentage and sibship assignments because of the more efficient use of marker information. It is little affected by inbreeding in parents and is moderately robust to nonrandom mating and linkage of markers. We also show that individually much less informative markers, such as SNPs or AFLPs, can reach the same power for parentage and sibship inferences as the highly informative marker simple sequence repeats (SSRs), as long as a sufficient number of loci are employed in the analysis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221199      PMCID: PMC2666522          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.100214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  39 in total

1.  Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error.

Authors:  Solveig K Sieberts; Ellen M Wijsman; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; William R Ardren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.

Authors:  A Bonin; E Bellemain; P Bronken Eidesen; F Pompanon; C Brochmann; P Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.

Authors:  Stuart C Thomas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Sonya M Clegg; John Chittock; Terry Burke; Mark W Blows; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Parentage identification using single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes: application to product tracing.

Authors:  W G Hill; B A Salisbury; A J Webb
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators.

Authors:  R E Chapman; J Wang; A F G Bourke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  90 in total

1.  Invisible pair bonds detected by molecular analyses.

Authors:  Tetsumi Takahashi; Haruki Ochi; Masanori Kohda; Michio Hori
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Turtle mating patterns buffer against disruptive effects of climate change.

Authors:  Lucy I Wright; Kimberley L Stokes; Wayne J Fuller; Brendan J Godley; Andrew McGowan; Robin Snape; Tom Tregenza; Annette C Broderick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Sensitive males: inbreeding depression in an endangered bird.

Authors:  Patricia Brekke; Peter M Bennett; Jinliang Wang; Nathalie Pettorelli; John G Ewen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Population Genetic and Social Structure Survey of Solenopsis geminata in Thailand.

Authors:  Mingkwan Nipitwattanaphon; Akarapong Swatdipong; Sasitorn Hasin; John Wang
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  A new likelihood estimator and its comparison with moment estimators of individual genome-wide diversity.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Tracking larvae with molecular markers reveals high relatedness and early seasonal recruitment success in a partially spawning marine bivalve.

Authors:  Philippe St-Onge; Réjean Tremblay; Jean-Marie Sévigny
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Population structure and effective/census population size ratio in threatened three-spined stickleback populations from an isolated river basin in northwest Spain.

Authors:  A Pérez-Figueroa; C Fernández; R Amaro; M Hermida; E San Miguel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Authors:  Marco Galaverni; Romolo Caniglia; Pietro Milanesi; Silvana Lapalombella; Elena Fabbri; Ettore Randi
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.