Literature DB >> 12969458

Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.

Adam G Jones1, William R Ardren.   

Abstract

The recent proliferation of hypervariable molecular markers has ushered in a surge of techniques for the analysis of parentage in natural and experimental populations. Consequently, the potential for meaningful studies of paternity and maternity is at an all-time high. However, the details and implementation of the multifarious techniques often differ in subtle ways that can influence the results of parentage analyses. Now is a good time to reflect on the available techniques and to consider their strengths and weaknesses. Here, we review the leading techniques in parentage analysis, with a particular emphasis on those that have been implemented in readily useable software packages. Our survey leads to some important insights with respect to the utility of the different approaches. This review should serve as a useful guide to anyone who wishes to embark on the study of parentage.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12969458     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01928.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  81 in total

1.  MHC-mediated spatial distribution in brown trout (Salmo trutta) fry.

Authors:  B O'Farrell; J A H Benzie; P McGinnity; J Carlsson; E de Eyto; E Dillane; C Graham; J Coughlan; T Cross
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Multiple mating and its relationship to alternative modes of gestation in male-pregnant versus female-pregnant fish species.

Authors:  John C Avise; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Microsatellite-based parentage analysis of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) using nonlethal DNA sampling.

Authors:  Jacklyn Wong; Yui Yin Chu; Steven T Stoddard; Yoosook Lee; Amy C Morrison; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Evidence of limited polyandry in a natural population of Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Joshua B Richardson; Samuel B Jameson; Andrea Gloria-Soria; Dawn M Wesson; Jeffrey Powell
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A graphical approach to relatedness inference.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 1.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.