Literature DB >> 18211872

Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Francesca D Frentiu1, Sonya M Clegg, John Chittock, Terry Burke, Mark W Blows, Ian P F Owens.   

Abstract

Animal models typically require a known genetic pedigree to estimate quantitative genetic parameters. Here we test whether animal models can alternatively be based on estimates of relatedness derived entirely from molecular marker data. Our case study is the morphology of a wild bird population, for which we report estimates of the genetic variance-covariance matrices (G) of six morphological traits using three methods: the traditional animal model; a molecular marker-based approach to estimate heritability based on Ritland's pairwise regression method; and a new approach using a molecular genealogy arranged in a relatedness matrix (R) to replace the pedigree in an animal model. Using the traditional animal model, we found significant genetic variance for all six traits and positive genetic covariance among traits. The pairwise regression method did not return reliable estimates of quantitative genetic parameters in this population, with estimates of genetic variance and covariance typically being very small or negative. In contrast, we found mixed evidence for the use of the pedigree-free animal model. Similar to the pairwise regression method, the pedigree-free approach performed poorly when the full-rank R matrix based on the molecular genealogy was employed. However, performance improved substantially when we reduced the dimensionality of the R matrix in order to maximize the signal to noise ratio. Using reduced-rank R matrices generated estimates of genetic variance that were much closer to those from the traditional model. Nevertheless, this method was less reliable at estimating covariances, which were often estimated to be negative. Taken together, these results suggest that pedigree-free animal models can recover quantitative genetic information, although the signal remains relatively weak. It remains to be determined whether this problem can be overcome by the use of a more powerful battery of molecular markers and improved methods for reconstructing genealogies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211872      PMCID: PMC2596847          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  49 in total

1.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Large size in an island-dwelling bird: intraspecific competition and the Dominance Hypothesis.

Authors:  S I Robinson-Wolrath; I P F Owens
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting.

Authors:  David W Coltman; Paul O'Donoghue; Jon T Jorgenson; John T Hogg; Curtis Strobeck; Marco Festa-Bianchet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.

Authors:  Stuart C Thomas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Toby Johnson; Dario Beraldi; Tim Clutton-Brock; Dave Coltman; Bengt Hansson; Goran Spong; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Large body size in an island-dwelling bird: a microevolutionary analysis.

Authors:  F D Frentiu; S M Clegg; M W Blows; I P F Owens
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Increasing the efficiency of variance component quantitative trait loci analysis by using reduced-rank identity-by-descent matrices.

Authors:  Lars Rönnegård; Kateryna Mischenko; Sverker Holmgren; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Direct versus indirect sexual selection: genetic basis of colour, size and recruitment in a wild bird.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield; Malcolm D Burgess; Alex Lord; Albert B Phillimore; Sonya M Clegg; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Marker-based quantitative genetics in the wild?: the heritability and genetic correlation of chemical defenses in eucalyptus.

Authors:  R L Andrew; R Peakall; I R Wallis; J T Wood; E J Knight; W J Foley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  20 in total

1.  Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population.

Authors:  Celine H Frère; Michael Krützen; Janet Mann; Richard C Connor; Lars Bejder; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Overview of techniques to account for confounding due to population stratification and cryptic relatedness in genomic data association analyses.

Authors:  M J Sillanpää
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Introduction. Evolutionary dynamics of wild populations: the use of long-term pedigree data.

Authors:  L E B Kruuk; W G Hill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Bayesian quantitative trait locus mapping based on reconstruction of recent genetic histories.

Authors:  Dario Gasbarra; Matti Pirinen; Mikko J Sillanpää; Elja Arjas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Nature and nurture: A step towards investigating their interactions in the wild.

Authors:  Celine H Fríre; Janet Mann; Michael Krützen; Richard C Connor; Lars Bejder; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-03

8.  Evolutionary constraints or opportunities?

Authors:  Alexei A Sharov
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Applying Quantitative Genetic Methods to Primate Social Behavior.

Authors:  Gregory E Blomquist; Lauren J N Brent
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Pedigree-free estimates of heritability in the wild: promising prospects for selfing populations.

Authors:  Laurene Gay; Mathieu Siol; Joelle Ronfort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.