Literature DB >> 26610365

Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.

Marco Galaverni1, Romolo Caniglia2, Pietro Milanesi2, Silvana Lapalombella2, Elena Fabbri2, Ettore Randi2.   

Abstract

A variety of nonrandom mate choice strategies, including disassortative mating, are used by vertebrate species to avoid inbreeding, maintain heterozygosity and increase fitness. Disassortative mating may be mediated by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), an important gene cluster controlling immune responses to pathogens. We investigated the patterns of mate choice in 26 wild-living breeding pairs of gray wolf (Canis lupus) that were identified through noninvasive genetic methods and genotyped at 3 MHC class II and 12 autosomal microsatellite (STR) loci. We tested for deviations from random mating and evaluated the covariance of genetic variables at functional and STR markers with fitness proxies deduced from pedigree reconstructions. Results did not show evidences of MHC-based disassortative mating. Rather we found a higher peptide similarity between mates at MHC loci as compared with random expectations. Fitness values were positively correlated with heterozygosity of the breeders at both MHC and STR loci, whereas they decreased with relatedness at STRs. These findings may indicate fitness advantages for breeders that, while avoiding highly related mates, are more similar at the MHC and have high levels of heterozygosity overall. Such a pattern of MHC-assortative mating may reflect local coadaptation of the breeders, while a reduction in genetic diversity may be balanced by heterozygote advantages. © The American Genetic Association 2015. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canis lupus; fitness; major histocompatibility complex; mate choice; microsatellites; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26610365      PMCID: PMC5994966          DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esv090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  65 in total

1.  The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves.

Authors:  Bridgett M Vonholdt; Daniel R Stahler; Douglas W Smith; Dent A Earl; John P Pollinger; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity enhances reproductive success.

Authors:  M Thoss; P Ilmonen; K Musolf; D J Penn
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Journal of heredity adopts joint data archiving policy.

Authors:  C Scott Baker
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Association of hypothyroid disease in Doberman Pinscher dogs with a rare major histocompatibility complex DLA class II haplotype.

Authors:  L J Kennedy; H J Huson; J Leonard; J M Angles; L E Fox; J W Wojciechowski; C Yuncker; G M Happ
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2006-01

6.  Nomenclature for factors of the dog major histocompatibility system (DLA), 2000: second report of the ISAG DLA Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  L J Kennedy; J M Angles; A Barnes; S D Carter; O Francino; J A Gerlach; G M Happ; W E Ollier; W Thomson; J L Wagner
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Allelic combinations of promoter and exon 2 in DQB1 in dogs and wolves.

Authors:  Karin T Berggren; Jennifer M Seddon
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders.

Authors:  David H Bos; Rod N Williams; David Gopurenko; Zafer Bulut; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Population genomics of the inbred Scandinavian wolf.

Authors:  Jenny Hagenblad; Maria Olsson; Heidi G Parker; Elaine A Ostrander; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  NCBI BLAST: a better web interface.

Authors:  Mark Johnson; Irena Zaretskaya; Yan Raytselis; Yuri Merezhuk; Scott McGinnis; Thomas L Madden
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomic analysis of MHC-based mate choice in the monogamous California mouse.

Authors:  Jesyka Meléndez-Rosa; Ke Bi; Eileen A Lacey
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  MHC class I diversity predicts non-random mating in Chinese alligators (Alligator sinensis).

Authors:  Qun-Hua Han; Ru-Na Sun; Hai-Qiong Yang; Zhen-Wei Wang; Qiu-Hong Wan; Sheng-Guo Fang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Dynamic range expansion leads to establishment of a new, genetically distinct wolf population in Central Europe.

Authors:  Maciej Szewczyk; Sabina Nowak; Natalia Niedźwiecka; Pavel Hulva; Renata Špinkytė-Bačkaitienė; Klára Demjanovičová; Barbora Černá Bolfíková; Vladimír Antal; Viktar Fenchuk; Michał Figura; Patrycja Tomczak; Przemysław Stachyra; Kinga M Stępniak; Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica; Robert W Mysłajek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.