Literature DB >> 20591862

Sensitive males: inbreeding depression in an endangered bird.

Patricia Brekke1, Peter M Bennett, Jinliang Wang, Nathalie Pettorelli, John G Ewen.   

Abstract

Attempts to conserve threatened species by establishing new populations via reintroduction are controversial. Theory predicts that genetic bottlenecks result in increased mating between relatives and inbreeding depression. However, few studies of wild sourced reintroductions have carefully examined these genetic consequences. Our study assesses inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a free-living reintroduced population of an endangered New Zealand bird, the hihi (Notiomystis cincta). Using molecular sexing and marker-based inbreeding coefficients estimated from 19 autosomal microsatellite loci, we show that (i) inbreeding depresses offspring survival, (ii) male embryos are more inbred on average than female embryos, (iii) the effect of inbreeding depression is male-biased and (iv) this population has a substantial genetic load. Male susceptibility to inbreeding during embryo and nestling development may be due to size dimorphism, resulting in faster growth rates and more stressful development for male embryos and nestlings compared with females. This work highlights the effects of inbreeding at early life-history stages and the repercussions for the long-term population viability of threatened species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20591862      PMCID: PMC2982255          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations?

Authors:  F Balloux; W Amos; T Coulson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility.

Authors:  O H Frankel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The adaptive significance of maternal effects.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; C W Fox
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Characterization of microsatellite loci In The hihi Notiomystis cincta (Notiomystidae, Aves).

Authors:  Patricia Brekke; Deborah A Dawson; Gavin J Horsburgh; John G Ewen
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 7.090

9.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

10.  Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  14 in total

1.  Causes of hatching failure in endangered birds.

Authors:  N Hemmings; M West; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Does inbreeding affect gene expression in birds?

Authors:  Bengt Hansson; Sara Naurin; Dennis Hasselquist
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue.

Authors:  Hazel A Jackson; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; Camilla Ryan; Mohammed F Albeshr; Luca Venturi; Hernán E Morales; Thomas C Mathers; Jonathan Cocker; Samuel A Speak; Gonzalo G Accinelli; Tom Barker; Darren Heavens; Faye Willman; Deborah Dawson; Lauren Ward; Vikash Tatayah; Nicholas Zuël; Richard Young; Lianne Concannon; Harriet Whitford; Bernardo Clavijo; Nancy Bunbury; Kevin M Tyler; Kevin Ruhomaun; Molly K Grace; Michael W Bruford; Carl G Jones; Simon Tollington; Diana J Bell; Jim J Groombridge; Matt Clark; Cock Van Oosterhout
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.563

4.  Differential allocation in a lekking bird: females lay larger eggs and are more likely to have male chicks when they mate with less related males.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sardell; Emily H DuVal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Using hair cortisol analysis to understand the biological factors that affect black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) stress physiology.

Authors:  R M Santymire; N Ali; P E Marinari; T M Livieri
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.079

6.  The use and abuse of genetic marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding.

Authors:  Helen R Taylor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Fine-scale genetic response to landscape change in a gliding mammal.

Authors:  Ross L Goldingay; Katherine A Harrisson; Andrea C Taylor; Tina M Ball; David J Sharpe; Brendan D Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intrinsic differences between males and females determine sex-specific consequences of inbreeding.

Authors:  Emily R Ebel; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Determinants of male floating behaviour and floater reproduction in a threatened population of the hihi (Notiomystis cincta).

Authors:  Patricia Brekke; John G Ewen; Gemma Clucas; Anna W Santure
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Telomere length reveals cumulative individual and transgenerational inbreeding effects in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Kat Bebbington; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; Hannah L Dugdale; Jan Komdeur; Terry Burke; David S Richardson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.