Literature DB >> 11727198

Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error.

Solveig K Sieberts1, Ellen M Wijsman, Elizabeth A Thompson.   

Abstract

Misspecification of relationships and of genotype data can cause problems in linkage analyses based on genome-scan data. Previous reports have focused on pairwise relationships and a simple error model. This article considers the increased information available from the joint analysis of trios of individuals, integrating this analysis with an error model that allows for the most common genotyping errors. Given observed marker phenotypes in a genome scan, computational methods are outlined both for likelihoods of relationships and for the posterior probabilities of underlying genotypes. The methods are applied to examples from two real data sets: one has been previously well analyzed, and, hence, Mendelian inconsistencies have been removed; the other typifies the pedigree and genotype errors encountered in the initial analyses of a study. It is demonstrated that the coupling of relationship inference and error detection is quite effective, that the error model is computationally practical, and that data on a third relative can often clarify relationships.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11727198      PMCID: PMC384885          DOI: 10.1086/338444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  12 in total

1.  Cleaning genotype data.

Authors:  K W Broman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.

Authors:  J A Douglas; M Boehnke; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data.

Authors:  M S McPeek; L Sun
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals.

Authors:  M P Epstein; W L Duren; M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Estimation of pairwise relationships in the presence of genotyping errors.

Authors:  K W Broman; J L Weber
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.

Authors:  H H Göring; J Ott
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies.

Authors:  M Boehnke; N J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Gene identities and multiple relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6.

Authors:  L R Cardon; S D Smith; D W Fulker; W J Kimberling; B F Pennington; J C DeFries
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Hyperlipidemia in coronary heart disease. II. Genetic analysis of lipid levels in 176 families and delineation of a new inherited disorder, combined hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  J L Goldstein; H G Schrott; W R Hazzard; E L Bierman; A G Motulsky
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  29 in total

1.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.

Authors:  Brook G Milligan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evidence of linkage of HDL level variation to APOC3 in two samples with different ascertainment.

Authors:  France Gagnon; Gail P Jarvik; Arno G Motulsky; Samir S Deeb; John D Brunzell; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Joint oligogenic segregation and linkage analysis using bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Ellen M Wijsman; Dongmei Yu
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Inferring coancestry in population samples in the presence of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  M D Brown; C G Glazner; C Zheng; E A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Identifying nineteenth century genealogical links from genotypes.

Authors:  Jim Stankovich; Melanie Bahlo; Justin P Rubio; Christopher R Wilkinson; Russell Thomson; Annette Banks; Maree Ring; Simon J Foote; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing HDL levels: evidence for multilocus inheritance in familial combined hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  France Gagnon; Gail P Jarvik; Michael D Badzioch; Arno G Motulsky; John D Brunzell; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson; John Carlos Garza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.

Authors:  Stuart C Thomas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.