Literature DB >> 9633105

Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

T C Marshall1, J Slate, L E Kruuk, J M Pemberton.   

Abstract

Paternity inference using highly polymorphic codominant markers is becoming common in the study of natural populations. However, multiple males are often found to be genetically compatible with each offspring tested, even when the probability of excluding an unrelated male is high. While various methods exist for evaluating the likelihood of paternity of each nonexcluded male, interpreting these likelihoods has hitherto been difficult, and no method takes account of the incomplete sampling and error-prone genetic data typical of large-scale studies of natural systems. We derive likelihood ratios for paternity inference with codominant markers taking account of typing error, and define a statistic delta for resolving paternity. Using allele frequencies from the study population in question, a simulation program generates criteria for delta that permit assignment of paternity to the most likely male with a known level of statistical confidence. The simulation takes account of the number of candidate males, the proportion of males that are sampled and gaps and errors in genetic data. We explore the potentially confounding effect of relatives and show that the method is robust to their presence under commonly encountered conditions. The method is demonstrated using genetic data from the intensively studied red deer (Cervus elaphus) population on the island of Rum, Scotland. The Windows-based computer program, CERVUS, described in this study is available from the authors. CERVUS can be used to calculate allele frequencies, run simulations and perform parentage analysis using data from all types of codominant markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9633105     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  535 in total

1.  Polygyny, mate-guarding, and posthumous fertilization as alternative male mating strategies.

Authors:  K R Zamudio; B Sinervo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Accurate partition of individuals into full-sib families from genetic data without parental information.

Authors:  B R Smith; C M Herbinger; H R Merry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Estimating the time to the most recent common ancestor for the Y chromosome or mitochondrial DNA for a pair of individuals.

Authors:  B Walsh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Jocelyn Poissant; John T Hogg; Corey S Davis; Joshua M Miller; Jillian F Maddox; David W Coltman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Evaluation of genetic variability in the collared peccary Pecari tajacu and the white-lipped peccary Tayassu pecari by microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Roxane Wirschum Silva; Thales R O de Freitas; Ives José Sbalqueiro
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

7.  Prioritizing tiger conservation through landscape genetics and habitat linkages.

Authors:  Bibek Yumnam; Yadvendradev V Jhala; Qamar Qureshi; Jesus E Maldonado; Rajesh Gopal; Swati Saini; Y Srinivas; Robert C Fleischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An improved technique for isolating codominant compound microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Chunlan L Lian; Md Abdul Wadud; Qifang Geng; Kenichiro Shimatani; Taizo Hogetsu
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Estimating the prevalence of inbreeding from incomplete pedigrees.

Authors:  T C Marshall; D W Coltman; J M Pemberton; J Slate; J A Spalton; F E Guinness; J A Smith; J G Pilkington; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.