Literature DB >> 16048788

The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations.

Stuart C Thomas1.   

Abstract

Molecular marker data collected from natural populations allows information on genetic relationships to be established without referencing an exact pedigree. Numerous methods have been developed to exploit the marker data. These fall into two main categories: method of moment estimators and likelihood estimators. Method of moment estimators are essentially unbiased, but utilise weighting schemes that are only optimal if the analysed pair is unrelated. Thus, they differ in their efficiency at estimating parameters for different relationship categories. Likelihood estimators show smaller mean squared errors but are much more biased. Both types of estimator have been used in variance component analysis to estimate heritability. All marker-based heritability estimators require that adequate levels of the true relationship be present in the population of interest and that adequate amounts of informative marker data are available. I review the different approaches to relationship estimation, with particular attention to optimizing the use of this relationship information in subsequent variance component estimation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16048788      PMCID: PMC1569511          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  44 in total

Review 1.  Estimating genetic correlations in natural populations.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error.

Authors:  Solveig K Sieberts; Ellen M Wijsman; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  On relationship inference using gamete identity by descent data.

Authors:  H Zhao; F Liang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  A bootstrap assessment of variability in pedigree reconstruction based on genetic markers.

Authors:  A Almudevar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?

Authors:  F Rousset
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Quantitative genetics: a promising approach for the assessment of genetic variation in endangered species.

Authors:  A Storfer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Distribution of genome shared IBD by half-sibs: approximation by the Poisson clumping heuristic.

Authors:  H Bickeböller; E A Thompson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators.

Authors:  R E Chapman; J Wang; A F G Bourke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; E Beecham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Toby Johnson; Dario Beraldi; Tim Clutton-Brock; Dave Coltman; Bengt Hansson; Goran Spong; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A graphical approach to relatedness inference.

Authors:  Anthony Almudevar
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Using genetic markers in unpedigreed populations to detect a heritable trait.

Authors:  Ken G Dodds; Peter R Amer; Benoît Auvray
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 5.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Sonya M Clegg; John Chittock; Terry Burke; Mark W Blows; Ian P F Owens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Whole genome approaches to quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 9.  Identity by descent: variation in meiosis, across genomes, and in populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Comparison of marker-based pairwise relatedness estimators on a pedigreed plant population.

Authors:  Marco C A M Bink; Amy D Anderson; W Eric van de Weg; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.