Literature DB >> 19218739

Calculation of water equivalent thickness of materials of arbitrary density, elemental composition and thickness in proton beam irradiation.

Rui Zhang1, Wayne D Newhauser.   

Abstract

In proton therapy, the radiological thickness of a material is commonly expressed in terms of water equivalent thickness (WET) or water equivalent ratio (WER). However, the WET calculations required either iterative numerical methods or approximate methods of unknown accuracy. The objective of this study was to develop a simple deterministic formula to calculate WET values with an accuracy of 1 mm for materials commonly used in proton radiation therapy. Several alternative formulas were derived in which the energy loss was calculated based on the Bragg-Kleeman rule (BK), the Bethe-Bloch equation (BB) or an empirical version of the Bethe-Bloch equation (EBB). Alternative approaches were developed for targets that were 'radiologically thin' or 'thick'. The accuracy of these methods was assessed by comparison to values from an iterative numerical method that utilized evaluated stopping power tables. In addition, we also tested the approximate formula given in the International Atomic Energy Agency's dosimetry code of practice (Technical Report Series No 398, 2000, IAEA, Vienna) and stopping power ratio approximation. The results of these comparisons revealed that most methods were accurate for cases involving thin or low-Z targets. However, only the thick-target formulas provided accurate WET values for targets that were radiologically thick and contained high-Z material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218739      PMCID: PMC4140439          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  The water equivalence of solid materials used for dosimetry with small proton beams.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Peter Pemler; Jürgen Besserer; Matthias Dellert; Martin Moosburger; Jorrit de Boer; Eros Pedroni; Terence Boehringer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Determination of output factors for small proton therapy fields.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot; Wayne D Newhauser; Charles Bloch; R Allen White; Uwe Titt; George Starkschall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.

Authors:  Wayne Newhauser; Jonas Fontenot; Yuanshui Zheng; Jerimy Polf; Uwe Titt; Nicholas Koch; Xiaodong Zhang; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetric impact of radiopaque fiducial markers for proton radiotherapy of the prostate.

Authors:  Wayne Newhauser; Jonas Fontenot; Nicholas Koch; Lei Dong; Andrew Lee; Yuanshui Zheng; Laurie Waters; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The proton therapy system for MGH's NPTC: equipment description and progress report.

Authors:  Y Jongen; W Beeckman; P Cohilis
Journal:  Bull Cancer Radiother       Date:  1996

7.  Microdosimetry spectra of the Loma Linda proton beam and relative biological effectiveness comparisons.

Authors:  G Coutrakon; J Cortese; A Ghebremedhin; J Hubbard; J Johanning; P Koss; G Maudsley; C R Slater; C Zuccarelli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Proton penetration and control in nonhomogeneous phantoms.

Authors:  C L Wingate; J O Archambeau; A M Koehler; G W Bennett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Adjustment of the lateral and longitudinal size of scanned proton beam spots using a pre-absorber to optimize penumbrae and delivery efficiency.

Authors:  Uwe Titt; Dragan Mirkovic; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Luis A Perles; Wayne D Newhauser; Phillip J Taddei; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Yang-Kyun Park; Gregory C Sharp; Justin Phillips; Brian A Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Water equivalent path length calculations using scatter-corrected head and neck CBCT images to evaluate patients for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Jihun Kim; Yang-Kyun Park; Gregory Sharp; Paul Busse; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Water equivalent thickness values of materials used in beams of protons, helium, carbon and iron ions.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Phillip J Taddei; Markus M Fitzek; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Calculations and measurements of the scintillator-to-water stopping power ratio of liquid scintillators for use in proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  W Scott Ingram; Daniel Robertson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 6.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Development and verification of an analytical algorithm to predict absorbed dose distributions in ocular proton therapy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas C Koch; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A semi-empirical model for the therapeutic range shift estimation caused by inhomogeneities in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Vadim Moskvin; Chee-Wai Cheng; Leia Fanelli; Li Zhao; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in CT studies used for proton radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Karin M Andersson; Anders Ahnesjö; Christina Vallhagen Dahlgren
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Quantitative assessment of anatomical change using a virtual proton depth radiograph for adaptive head and neck proton therapy.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Lingshu Yin; Yawei Zhang; Maura Kirk; Gang Song; Peter H Ahn; Alexander Lin; James Gee; Derek Dolney; Timothy D Solberg; Richard Maughan; James McDonough; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.