Literature DB >> 12512731

The water equivalence of solid materials used for dosimetry with small proton beams.

Uwe Schneider1, Peter Pemler, Jürgen Besserer, Matthias Dellert, Martin Moosburger, Jorrit de Boer, Eros Pedroni, Terence Boehringer.   

Abstract

Various solid materials are used instead of water for absolute dosimetry with small proton beams. This may result in a dose measurement different to that in water, even when the range of protons in the phantom material is considered correctly. This dose difference is caused by the diverse cross sections for inelastic nuclear scattering in water and in the phantom materials respectively. To estimate the magnitude of this effect, flux and dose measurements with a 177 MeV proton pencil beam having a width of 0.6 cm (FWHM) were performed. The proton flux and the deposited dose in the beam path were determined behind water, lucite, polyethylene, teflon, and aluminum of diverse thicknesses. The number of out-scattered protons due to inelastic nuclear scattering was determined for water and the different materials. The ratios of the number of scattered protons in the materials relative to that in water were found to be 1.20 for lucite, 1.16 for polyethylene, 1.22 for teflon, and 1.03 for aluminum. The difference between the deposited dose in water and in the phantom materials taken in the center of the proton pencil beam, was estimated from the flux measurements, always taking the different ranges of protons in the materials into account. The estimated dose difference relative to water in 15 cm water equivalent thickness was -2.3% for lucite, -1.7% for polyethylene, -2.5% for teflon, and -0.4% for aluminum. The dose deviation was verified by a measurement using an ionization chamber. It should be noted that the dose error is larger when the effective point of measurement in the material is deeper or when the energy is higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12512731     DOI: 10.1118/1.1523408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Impact of range shifter material on proton pencil beam spot characteristics.

Authors:  Jiajian Shen; Wei Liu; Aman Anand; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Mirek Fatyga; Michael G Herman; Martin Bues
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants.

Authors:  Joost M Verburg; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Calculation of water equivalent thickness of materials of arbitrary density, elemental composition and thickness in proton beam irradiation.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A semi-empirical model for the therapeutic range shift estimation caused by inhomogeneities in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Vadim Moskvin; Chee-Wai Cheng; Leia Fanelli; Li Zhao; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A Beam-Angle-Selection Method to Improve Inter-Fraction Motion Robustness for Lung Tumor Irradiation With Passive Proton Scattering.

Authors:  Yawei Zhang; Meng Wei Ho; Zuofeng Li
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.