Literature DB >> 20371908

Water equivalent thickness values of materials used in beams of protons, helium, carbon and iron ions.

Rui Zhang1, Phillip J Taddei, Markus M Fitzek, Wayne D Newhauser.   

Abstract

Heavy charged particle beam radiotherapy for cancer is of increasing interest because it delivers a highly conformal radiation dose to the target volume. Accurate knowledge of the range of a heavy charged particle beam after it penetrates a patient's body or other materials in the beam line is very important and is usually stated in terms of the water equivalent thickness (WET). However, methods of calculating WET for heavy charged particle beams are lacking. Our objective was to test several simple analytical formulas previously developed for proton beams for their ability to calculate WET values for materials exposed to beams of protons, helium, carbon and iron ions. Experimentally measured heavy charged particle beam ranges and WET values from an iterative numerical method were compared with the WET values calculated by the analytical formulas. In most cases, the deviations were within 1 mm. We conclude that the analytical formulas originally developed for proton beams can also be used to calculate WET values for helium, carbon and iron ion beams with good accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371908      PMCID: PMC2977971          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/9/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization.

Authors:  M Krämer; O Jäkel; T Haberer; G Kraft; D Schardt; U Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Heavy ion therapy: status and perspectives.

Authors:  O Jäkel; D Schulz-Ertner; C P Karger; A Nikoghosyan; J Debus
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10

Review 3.  Radiation therapy with charged particles.

Authors:  Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Oliver Jäkel; Wolfgang Schlegel
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 4.  Particle radiation therapy using proton and heavier ion beams.

Authors:  Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm.

Authors:  Wayne Newhauser; Jonas Fontenot; Yuanshui Zheng; Jerimy Polf; Uwe Titt; Nicholas Koch; Xiaodong Zhang; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dosimetric impact of tantalum markers used in the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Nicholas C Koch; Jonas D Fontenot; Stanley J Rosenthal; Dan S Gombos; Markus M Fitzek; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The proton therapy system for MGH's NPTC: equipment description and progress report.

Authors:  Y Jongen; W Beeckman; P Cohilis
Journal:  Bull Cancer Radiother       Date:  1996

8.  Proton beam dosimetry for radiosurgery: implementation of the ICRU Report 59 at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Karla D Myers; Stanley J Rosenthal; Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Ion stopping powers and CT numbers.

Authors:  Michael F Moyers; Milind Sardesai; Sean Sun; Daniel W Miller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.482

10.  Can megavoltage computed tomography reduce proton range uncertainties in treatment plans for patients with large metal implants?

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Annelise Giebeler; Katja M Langen; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  5 in total

1.  Calculations and measurements of the scintillator-to-water stopping power ratio of liquid scintillators for use in proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  W Scott Ingram; Daniel Robertson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 2.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Research Facility for Radiobiological Studies at the University Proton Therapy Dresden.

Authors:  Elke Beyreuther; Michael Baumann; Wolfgang Enghardt; Stephan Helmbrecht; Leonhard Karsch; Mechthild Krause; Jörg Pawelke; Lena Schreiner; Michael Schürer; Cläre von Neubeck; Armin Lühr
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  Software platform for simulation of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Authors:  Valentina Giacometti; Vladimir A Bashkirov; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Susanna Guatelli; Tia E Plautz; Hartmut F-W Sadrozinski; Robert P Johnson; Andriy Zatserklyaniy; Thomas Tessonnier; Katia Parodi; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Reinhard W Schulte
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  A semi-empirical model for the therapeutic range shift estimation caused by inhomogeneities in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Vadim Moskvin; Chee-Wai Cheng; Leia Fanelli; Li Zhao; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.