Literature DB >> 20071765

Development and verification of an analytical algorithm to predict absorbed dose distributions in ocular proton therapy using Monte Carlo simulations.

Nicholas C Koch1, Wayne D Newhauser.   

Abstract

Proton beam radiotherapy is an effective and non-invasive treatment for uveal melanoma. Recent research efforts have focused on improving the dosimetric accuracy of treatment planning and overcoming the present limitation of relative analytical dose calculations. Monte Carlo algorithms have been shown to accurately predict dose per monitor unit (D/MU) values, but this has yet to be shown for analytical algorithms dedicated to ocular proton therapy, which are typically less computationally expensive than Monte Carlo algorithms. The objective of this study was to determine if an analytical method could predict absolute dose distributions and D/MU values for a variety of treatment fields like those used in ocular proton therapy. To accomplish this objective, we used a previously validated Monte Carlo model of an ocular nozzle to develop an analytical algorithm to predict three-dimensional distributions of D/MU values from pristine Bragg peaks and therapeutically useful spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs). Results demonstrated generally good agreement between the analytical and Monte Carlo absolute dose calculations. While agreement in the proximal region decreased for beams with less penetrating Bragg peaks compared with the open-beam condition, the difference was shown to be largely attributable to edge-scattered protons. A method for including this effect in any future analytical algorithm was proposed. Comparisons of D/MU values showed typical agreement to within 0.5%. We conclude that analytical algorithms can be employed to accurately predict absolute proton dose distributions delivered by an ocular nozzle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20071765      PMCID: PMC4134014          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/3/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  Real-time dose calculation and visualization for the proton therapy of ocular tumours.

Authors:  K Pfeiffer; R Bendl
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monitor unit calculations for range-modulated spread-out Bragg peak fields.

Authors:  Hanne M Kooy; Matthew Schaefer; Skip Rosenthal; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations.

Authors:  L Hong; M Goitein; M Bucciolini; R Comiskey; B Gottschalk; S Rosenthal; C Serago; M Urie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Proton beam dosimetry for radiosurgery: implementation of the ICRU Report 59 at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Karla D Myers; Stanley J Rosenthal; Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Planning proton therapy of the eye.

Authors:  M Goitein; T Miller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dosimetric evaluation of a pencil-beam algorithm for electrons employing a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction.

Authors:  K R Hogstrom; M D Mills; J A Meyer; J R Palta; D E Mellenberg; R T Meoz; R S Fields
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Uveal melanomas. Conservation treatment.

Authors:  J E Munzenrider
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  Maximizing local tumor control and survival after proton beam radiotherapy of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  E Egger; A Schalenbourg; L Zografos; L Bercher; T Boehringer; L Chamot; G Goitein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Dosimetry for ocular proton beam therapy at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory based on the ICRU Report 59.

Authors:  W D Newhauser; J Burns; A R Smith
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of targeting accuracy of a low-energy stereotactic radiosurgery treatment for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Erik Chell; Steven Hansen; Michael Gertner; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Benchmark measurements and simulations of dose perturbations due to metallic spheres in proton beams.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Laura Rechner; Dragan Mirkovic; Pablo Yepes; Nicholas C Koch; Uwe Titt; Jonas D Fontenot; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 3.  The physics of proton therapy.

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  GRID-ENABLED TREATMENT PLANNING FOR PROTON THERAPY USING MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS.

Authors:  Ravi Vadapalli; Pablo Yepes; Wayne Newhauser; Roger Lichti
Journal:  Nucl Technol       Date:  2011-07

5.  Optimization of a general-purpose, actively scanned proton beamline for ocular treatments: Geant4 simulations.

Authors:  Pierluigi Piersimoni; Adele Rimoldi; Cristina Riccardi; Michele Pirola; Silvia Molinelli; Mario Ciocca
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Three-dimensional MRI-based treatment planning approach for non-invasive ocular proton therapy.

Authors:  E Fleury; P Trnková; E Erdal; M Hassan; B Stoel; M Jaarma-Coes; G Luyten; J Herault; A Webb; J-W Beenakker; J-P Pignol; M Hoogeman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.