Literature DB >> 19175103

Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Scott E Davidson1, Richard A Popple, Geoffrey S Ibbott, David S Followill.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of five commonly used intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems (TPSs), 3 using convolution superposition algorithms or the analytical anisotropic algorithm (CSA/AAAs) and 2 using pencil beam algorithms (PBAs), in calculating the absorbed dose within a low-density, heterogeneous region when compared with measurements made in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. The dose predicted in the target center met the test criteria (5% of the dose normalization point or 3 mm distance to agreement) for all TPSs tested; however, at the tumor-lung interface and at the peripheral lung in the vicinity of the tumor, the CSA/AAAs performed better than the PBAs (85% and 50%, respectively, of pixels meeting the 5%/3-mm test criteria), and thus should be used to determine dose in heterogeneous regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175103      PMCID: PMC2736720          DOI: 10.1118/1.3006353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  LUNG CORRECTIONS IN COBALT 60 BEAM THERAPY.

Authors:  H F BATHO
Journal:  J Can Assoc Radiol       Date:  1964-06

2.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.

Authors:  P Carrasco; N Jornet; M A Duch; L Weber; M Ginjaume; T Eudaldo; D Jurado; A Ruiz; M Ribas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.

Authors:  Andrew O Jones; Indra J Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Energy dependence of response of new high sensitivity radiochromic films for megavoltage and kilovoltage radiation energies.

Authors:  Sou-Tung Chiu-Tsao; Yunsil Ho; Ravi Shankar; Lin Wang; Louis B Harrison
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms.

Authors:  W B Harms; D A Low; J W Wong; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  B Fraass; K Doppke; M Hunt; G Kutcher; G Starkschall; R Stern; J Van Dyke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data.

Authors:  P Storchi; E Woudstra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Dosimetric characteristics of an improved radiochromic film.

Authors:  A S Meigooni; M F Sanders; G S Ibbott; S R Szeglin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.

Authors:  Barbara Vanderstraeten; Nick Reynaert; Leen Paelinck; Indira Madani; Carlos De Wagter; Werner De Gersem; Wilfried De Neve; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Patient specific treatment verifications for helical tomotherapy treatment plans.

Authors:  S D Thomas; M Mackenzie; G C Field; A M Syme; B G Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  15 in total

1.  Synchronous bilateral squamous cell carcinoma of the lung successfully treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  S W Loo; S Smith; D A Promnitz; F Van Tornout
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Examining credentialing criteria and poor performance indicators for IROC Houston's anthropomorphic head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Mallory E Carson; Andrea Molineu; Paige A Taylor; David S Followill; Francesco C Stingo; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Jing Cui; Stephen Kry; Joseph O Deasy; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Milos Vicic; R Allen White; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the Radiological Physics Center's anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Andrea Molineu; Carrie Amador; James Galvin; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool.

Authors:  Austin M Faught; Scott E Davidson; Jonas Fontenot; Stephen F Kry; Carol Etzel; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport algorithm for heterogeneous dose calculation in lung cancer.

Authors:  Tao Han; David Followill; Justin Mikell; Roman Repchak; Andrea Molineu; Rebecca Howell; Mohammad Salehpour; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A novel simple phantom for verifying the dose of radiation therapy.

Authors:  J H Lee; L T Chang; A C Shiau; C W Chen; Y J Liao; W J Li; M S Lee; S M Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Use of reduced dose rate when treating moving tumors using dynamic IMRT.

Authors:  Laurence Court; Matthew Wagar; Madeleine Bogdanov; Dan Ionascu; Deborah Schofield; Aaron Allen; Ross Berbeco; Tania Lingos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of a novel secondary check tool for intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.