Literature DB >> 8730662

Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data.

P Storchi1, E Woudstra.   

Abstract

In radiotherapy, accurately calculated dose distributions of irregularly shaped photon beams are needed. In this paper, an algorithm is presented which enables the calculation of dose distributions due to irregular fields using pencil beam kernels derived from simple basic beam data usually measured on treatment units, i.e. central axis depth-dose curves and profiles. The only extra data that are needed, and are not currently measured, is the phantom scatter factor curve at the reference depth. The algorithm has been developed as an extension to a previously developed algorithm for rectangular fields which is based on the Milan-Bentley storage model. In the case of an irregular field, the depth dose and the boundary function are computed by convolution of a field intensity function with pencil beam kernels. The depth dose is computed by using a 'scatter' kernel, which is derived from the stored depth-dose curves and from the phantom scatter factor curve. The boundary function is computed by using a 'boundary' kernel, which is derived from the boundary profile of a number of large square fields. Because of the simplicity of the data used and the underlying concepts, which for instance do not separate the head scatter from the primary beam, this algorithm presents some shortcomings. On the other hand, this simplicity is also of great advantage and the inaccuracy is acceptable for most clinical situations.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8730662     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/4/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dose calculation accuracies in whole breast radiotherapy treatment planning: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shogo Hatanaka; Yuki Miyabe; Naoki Tohyama; Yu Kumazaki; Masahiko Kurooka; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Hidenobu Tachibana; Satoshi Kito; Akihisa Wakita; Yuko Ohotomo; Hiroyuki Ikagawa; Satoshi Ishikura; Miwako Nozaki; Yoshikazu Kagami; Masahiro Hiraoka; Teiji Nishio
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-02-03

3.  Calculation of the entrance skin dose distribution for fluoroscopically guided interventions using a pencil beam backscatter model.

Authors:  Sarath Vijayan; Zhenyu Xiong; Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-14

4.  A simple calculation method for determination of equivalent square field.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Shafiei; Hadi Hasanzadeh; Seyed Ahmad Shafiei
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

5.  Dose prediction accuracy of anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm beyond high density heterogeneity interface.

Authors:  Suresh B Rana
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-01

6.  Data for TROTS - The Radiotherapy Optimisation Test Set.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Breedveld; Ben Heijmen
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-04-01

7.  Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions.

Authors:  Jarkko J Ojala; Mika K Kapanen; Simo J Hyödynmaa; Tuija K Wigren; Maunu A Pitkänen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Correlation between target volume and electron transport effects affecting heterogeneity corrections in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Yuichi Akino; Indra J Das; Higinia R Cardenes; Colleen M Desrosiers
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.

Authors:  Paola Francisca Caprile; Carlos Daniel Venencia; Pelayo Besa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Evaluation of the analytical anisotropic algorithm in an extreme water-lung interface phantom using Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Isabelle M Gagné; Sergei Zavgorodni
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.