Literature DB >> 15543799

Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.

P Carrasco1, N Jornet, M A Duch, L Weber, M Ginjaume, T Eudaldo, D Jurado, A Ruiz, M Ribas.   

Abstract

An extensive set of benchmark measurement of PDDs and beam profiles was performed in a heterogeneous layer phantom, including a lung equivalent heterogeneity, by means of several detectors and compared against the predicted dose values by different calculation algorithms in two treatment planning systems. PDDs were measured with TLDs, plane parallel and cylindrical ionization chambers and beam profiles with films. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations by means of the PENELOPE code were performed. Four different field sizes (10 x 10, 5 x 5, 2 x 2, and 1 x 1 cm2) and two lung equivalent materials (CIRS, p(w)e=0.195 and St. Bartholomew Hospital, London, p(w)e=0.244-0.322) were studied. The performance of four correction-based algorithms and one based on convolution-superposition was analyzed. The correction-based algorithms were the Batho, the Modified Batho, and the Equivalent TAR implemented in the Cadplan (Varian) treatment planning system and the TMS Pencil Beam from the Helax-TMS (Nucletron) treatment planning system. The convolution-superposition algorithm was the Collapsed Cone implemented in the Helax-TMS. The only studied calculation methods that correlated successfully with the measured values with a 2% average inside all media were the Collapsed Cone and the Monte Carlo simulation. The biggest difference between the predicted and the delivered dose in the beam axis was found for the EqTAR algorithm inside the CIRS lung equivalent material in a 2 x 2 cm2 18 MV x-ray beam. In these conditions, average and maximum difference against the TLD measurements were 32% and 39%, respectively. In the water equivalent part of the phantom every algorithm correctly predicted the dose (within 2%) everywhere except very close to the interfaces where differences up to 24% were found for 2 x 2 cm2 18 MV photon beams. Consistent values were found between the reference detector (ionization chamber in water and TLD in lung) and Monte Carlo simulations, yielding minimal differences (0.4%+/-1.2%). The penumbra broadening effect in low density media was not predicted by any of the correction-based algorithms, and the only one that matched the experimental values and the Monte Carlo simulations within the estimated uncertainties was the Collapsed Cone Algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543799     DOI: 10.1118/1.1788932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  34 in total

1.  Dosimetric verification in inhomogeneous phantom geometries for the XiO radiotherapy treatment planning system with 6-MV photon beams.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kohno; Satoshi Kitou; Eriko Hirano; Satoru Kameoka; Tomonori Goka; Teiji Nishio; Tomoko Miyagishi; Takaki Ariji; Mitsuhiko Kawashima; Takashi Ogino
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-25

2.  Dosimetric verification of the anisotropic analytical algorithm in lung equivalent heterogeneities with and without bone equivalent heterogeneities.

Authors:  Kaoru Ono; Satoru Endo; Kenichi Tanaka; Masaharu Hoshi; Yutaka Hirokawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of measured and calculated doses in a Rando phantom with a realistic lung radiotherapy treatment plan including heterogeneities.

Authors:  Serine Sarra Bouacid; Fayçal Kharfi; Fouad Boulakhssaim
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Fast Monte Carlo simulation on a voxelized human phantom deformed to a patient.

Authors:  G Bueno; O Déniz; C B Carrascosa; J M Delgado; L Brualla
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Evaluation of 4D dose to a moving target with Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Kiyotomo Matsugi; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Yuki Miyabe; Chikako Yamauchi; Yukinori Matsuo; Takashi Mizowaki; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-18

7.  Monte carlo simulation of bony heterogeneity effects on dose profile for small irradiation field in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Simone C Cardoso; Victor Gabriel L Alves; Luiz Antonio R da Rosa; Luciana T Campos; Delano V S Batista; Alessandro Facure
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dosimetric evaluation of heterogeneity corrections for RTOG 0236: stereotactic body radiotherapy of inoperable stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Lech Papiez; Rebecca Paulus; Robert Timmerman; William L Straube; Walter R Bosch; Jeff Michalski; James M Galvin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Dose measurements in a thorax phantom at 3DCRT breast radiation therapy.

Authors:  Elsa Bifano Pimenta; Luciana Batista Nogueira; Tarcísio Passos Ribeiro de Campos
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-04-14

10.  Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam based optimization of stereotactic lung IMRT.

Authors:  Marcin Sikora; Jan Muzik; Matthias Söhn; Martin Weinmann; Markus Alber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.