Literature DB >> 9800687

American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning.

B Fraass1, K Doppke, M Hunt, G Kutcher, G Starkschall, R Stern, J Van Dyke.   

Abstract

In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9800687     DOI: 10.1118/1.598373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  168 in total

1.  Dosimetric verification in inhomogeneous phantom geometries for the XiO radiotherapy treatment planning system with 6-MV photon beams.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kohno; Satoshi Kitou; Eriko Hirano; Satoru Kameoka; Tomonori Goka; Teiji Nishio; Tomoko Miyagishi; Takaki Ariji; Mitsuhiko Kawashima; Takashi Ogino
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-25

2.  Clinical implementation of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with ERGO++.

Authors:  Dirk Wolff; Florian Stieler; Brigitte Hermann; Katharina Heim; Sven Clausen; Jens Fleckenstein; Martin Polednik; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning.

Authors:  S P Srivastava; C-W Cheng; I J Das
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  An analysis of an implantable dosimeter system for external beam therapy.

Authors:  Robert D Black; Charles W Scarantino; Gregory G Mann; Mitchell S Anscher; Robert D Ornitz; Benjamin E Nelms
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Benchmarking of Monte Carlo simulation of bremsstrahlung from thick targets at radiotherapy energies.

Authors:  Bruce A Faddegon; Makoto Asai; Joseph Perl; Carl Ross; Josep Sempau; Jane Tinslay; Francesc Salvat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Hounsfield units variations: impact on CT-density based conversion tables and their effects on dose distribution.

Authors:  B Zurl; R Tiefling; P Winkler; P Kindl; K S Kapp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dosimetry and treatment planning of Occu-Prosta I-125 seeds for intraocular lesions.

Authors:  Suresh Chaudhari; Sudesh Deshpande; Vivek Anand; Sandeep De; Sanjay Saxena; A Dash; Mahua Basu; Preetam Samant; V Kannan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.