Literature DB >> 19173430

Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Karen S Helfer1, Richard L Freyman.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted using the TVM sentences, a new set of stimuli for competing speech research. These open-set sentences incorporate a cue name that allows the experimenter to direct the listener's attention to a target sentence. The first experiment compared the relative efficacy of directing the listener's attention to the cue name versus instructing the subject to listen for a particular talker's voice. Results demonstrated that listeners could use either cue about equally well to find the target sentence. Experiment 2 was designed to determine whether differences in intelligibility among talkers' voices that were noted when three utterances were presented together persisted when each talker's sentences were presented in steady-state noise. Results of experiment 2 showed only minor intelligibility differences between talkers' utterances presented in noise. The final experiment considered how providing accurate and inaccurate information about the target talker's voice influenced speech recognition performance. This voice cue was found to have minimal effect on listeners' ability to understand the target utterance or ignore a masking voice.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173430      PMCID: PMC2736724          DOI: 10.1121/1.3035837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  34 in total

1.  Selective attention in perceptual adjustments to voice.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; J N Howe
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1999-10

2.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Brian D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Release from speech-on-speech masking by adding a delayed masker at a different location.

Authors:  Brad Rakerd; Neil L Aaronson; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Variability and uncertainty in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Karen S Helfer; Uma Balakrishnan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

10.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08
View more
  26 in total

1.  Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-11-29

2.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Priming of lowpass-filtered speech affects response bias, not sensitivity, in a bandwidth discrimination task.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Neil A Macmillan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age equivalence in the benefit of repetition for speech understanding.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.