Literature DB >> 26233036

Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Karen S Helfer1, Alexandra Jesse2.   

Abstract

The influence of lexical characteristics of words in to-be-attended and to-be-ignored speech streams was examined in a competing speech task. Older, middle-aged, and younger adults heard pairs of low-cloze probability sentences in which the frequency or neighborhood density of words was manipulated in either the target speech stream or the masking speech stream. All participants also completed a battery of cognitive measures. As expected, for all groups, target words that occur frequently or that are from sparse lexical neighborhoods were easier to recognize than words that are infrequent or from dense neighborhoods. Compared to other groups, these neighborhood density effects were largest for older adults; the frequency effect was largest for middle-aged adults. Lexical characteristics of words in the to-be-ignored speech stream also affected recognition of to-be-attended words, but only when overall performance was relatively good (that is, when younger participants listened to the speech streams at a more advantageous signal-to-noise ratio). For these listeners, to-be-ignored masker words from sparse neighborhoods interfered with recognition of target speech more than masker words from dense neighborhoods. Amount of hearing loss and cognitive abilities relating to attentional control modulated overall performance as well as the strength of lexical influences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233036      PMCID: PMC4506307          DOI: 10.1121/1.4923155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Boaz M Ben-David; Craig G Chambers; Meredyth Daneman; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Eyal M Reingold; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.

Authors:  Patricia A Tun; Gail O'Kane; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-09

4.  Age and inhibition.

Authors:  L Hasher; E R Stoltzfus; R T Zacks; B Rypma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.

Authors:  William S Woods; Sridhar Kalluri; Shareka Pentony; Nazanin Nooraei
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A sub-process view of working memory capacity: evidence from effects of speech on prose memory.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jessica K Ljungberg; Robert Ljung
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2010-02-24

8.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.

Authors:  Jamie L Desjardins; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  14 in total

1.  Lexical Influences on Errors in Masked Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Does the semantic content or syntactic regularity of masker speech affect speech-on-speech recognition?

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Penelope Bencheck; Brandi Jett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 6.  Age-Related Changes in Objective and Subjective Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Peter A Wasiuk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 9.  Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Postural Control While Listening in Younger and Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob Banks
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.