Literature DB >> 27908048

Age equivalence in the benefit of repetition for speech understanding.

Karen S Helfer1, Richard L Freyman1.   

Abstract

Although repetition is the most commonly used conversational repair strategy, little is known about its relative effectiveness among listeners spanning the adult age range. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in how younger, middle-aged, and older adults were able to use immediate repetition to improve speech recognition in the presence of different kinds of maskers. Results suggest that all groups received approximately the same amount of benefit from repetition. Repetition benefit was largest when the masker was fluctuating noise and smallest when it was competing speech.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27908048      PMCID: PMC5392078          DOI: 10.1121/1.4966586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Elucidating the effects of ageing on remembering perceptually distorted word pairs.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  The effect of priming on release from informational masking is equivalent for younger and older adults.

Authors:  Payam Ezzatian; Liang Li; Kathy Pichora-Fuller; Bruce Schneider
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults.

Authors:  Signy Sheldon; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Repair strategy usage by hearing-impaired adults and changes following communication therapy.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

8.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  Does memory constrain utilization of top-down information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging.

Authors:  A Wingfield; A H Alexander; S Cavigelli
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Binaural temporal fine structure sensitivity, cognitive function, and spatial speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners (L).

Authors:  Tobias Neher; Thomas Lunner; Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Early aging and postural control while listening and responding.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob J Banks; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Lexical Influences on Errors in Masked Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  Age-Related Changes in Objective and Subjective Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Peter A Wasiuk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 5.  Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.