Literature DB >> 17297805

Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Kristin J Van Engen1, Ann R Bradlow.   

Abstract

Studies of speech perception in various types of background noise have shown that noise with linguistic content affects listeners differently than nonlinguistic noise [e.g., Simpson, S. A., and Cooke, M. (2005). "Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 2775-2778; Sperry, J. L., Wiley, T. L., and Chial, M. R. (1997). "Word recognition performance in various background competitors," J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 8, 71-80] but few studies of multi-talker babble have employed background babble in languages other than the target speech language. To determine whether the adverse effect of background speech is due to the linguistic content or to the acoustic characteristics of the speech masker, this study assessed speech-in-noise recognition when the language of the background noise was either the same or different from the language of the target speech. Replicating previous findings, results showed poorer English sentence recognition by native English listeners in six-talker babble than in two-talker babble, regardless of the language of the babble. In addition, our results showed that in two-talker babble, native English listeners were more adversely affected by English babble than by Mandarin Chinese babble. These findings demonstrate informational masking on sentence-in-noise recognition in the form of "linguistic interference." Whether this interference is at the lexical, sublexical, and/or prosodic levels of linguistic structure and whether it is modulated by the phonetic similarity between the target and noise languages remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297805      PMCID: PMC1850527          DOI: 10.1121/1.2400666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.

Authors:  Sander J van Wijngaarden; Herman J M Steeneken; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanić; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Release from informational masking by time reversal of native and non-native interfering speech.

Authors:  Koenraad S Rhebergen; Niek J Versfeld; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N.

Authors:  Sarah A Simpson; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Laurence White; James F Melhorn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

7.  Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.

Authors:  M L Garcia Lecumberri; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues.

Authors:  Gaurang Parikh; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  On the perception of voicing in syllable-initial plosives in noise.

Authors:  Jintao Jiang; Marcia Chen; Abeer Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal.

Authors:  F Ramus; M Nespor; J Mehler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17
View more
  71 in total

1.  Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus factors influencing spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Are there sex effects for speech intelligibility in American English? Examining the influence of talker, listener, and methodology.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Dane B Whittaker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  Adaptation to frozen babble in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Robert Albert Felty; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Combining degradations: The effect of background noise on intelligibility of disordered speech.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Stephanie A Borrie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.