Literature DB >> 21218894

Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Karen S Helfer1, Jamie Chevalier, Richard L Freyman.   

Abstract

Older individuals often report difficulty coping in situations with multiple conversations in which they at times need to "tune out" the background speech and at other times seek to monitor competing messages. The present study was designed to simulate this type of interaction by examining the cost of requiring listeners to perform a secondary task in conjunction with understanding a target talker in the presence of competing speech. The ability of younger and older adults to understand a target utterance was measured with and without requiring the listener to also determine how many masking voices were presented time-reversed. Also of interest was how spatial separation affected the ability to perform these two tasks. Older adults demonstrated slightly reduced overall speech recognition and obtained less spatial release from masking, as compared to younger listeners. For both younger and older listeners, spatial separation increased the costs associated with performing both tasks together. The meaningfulness of the masker had a greater detrimental effect on speech understanding for older participants than for younger participants. However, the results suggest that the problems experienced by older adults in complex listening situations are not necessarily due to a deficit in the ability to switch and/or divide attention among talkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21218894      PMCID: PMC3037770          DOI: 10.1121/1.3502462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  58 in total

1.  One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds.

Authors:  P A Tun; A Wingfield
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  C L Mackersie; T L Prida; D Stiles
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition.

Authors:  R L Freyman; U Balakrishnan; K S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Memorizing while walking: increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age.

Authors:  U Lindenberger; M Marsiske; P B Baltes
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-09

Review 6.  Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; John Cerella
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location.

Authors:  Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners.

Authors:  Patricia A Tun; Gail O'Kane; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-09

10.  Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening.

Authors:  Pádraig T Kitterick; Peter J Bailey; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  21 in total

1.  Perceiving sequential dependencies in auditory streams.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Eric R Thompson; Virginia Best; Gregory H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Adrian Staub
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 7.  Age-Related Changes in Objective and Subjective Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Peter A Wasiuk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  The neural processing of masked speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.