Literature DB >> 23927117

Priming of lowpass-filtered speech affects response bias, not sensitivity, in a bandwidth discrimination task.

Richard L Freyman1, Amanda M Griffin, Neil A Macmillan.   

Abstract

Priming is demonstrated when prior information about the content of a distorted, filtered, or masked auditory message improves its clarity. The current experiment attempted to quantify aspects of priming by determining its effects on performance and bias in a lowpass-filter-cutoff frequency discrimination task. Nonsense sentences recorded by a female talker were sharply lowpass filtered at a nominal cutoff frequency (F) of 0.5 or 0.75 kHz or at a higher cutoff frequency (F + ΔF). The listeners' task was to determine which interval of a two-interval-forced-choice trial contained the nonsense sentence filtered with F + ΔF. On priming trials, the interval 1 sentence was displayed on a computer screen prior to the auditory portion of the trial. The prime markedly affected bias, increasing the number of correct and incorrect interval 1 responses but did not affect overall discrimination performance substantially. These findings were supported through a second experiment that required listeners to make confidence judgments. The paradigm has the potential to help quantify the limits of speech perception when uncertainty about the auditory message is removed.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927117      PMCID: PMC3745481          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Auditory priming: implicit and explicit memory for words and voices.

Authors:  D L Schacter; B A Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-09

3.  Priming and human memory systems.

Authors:  E Tulving; D L Schacter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Bias in auditory priming.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; D Allbritton; G McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification.

Authors:  R Ratcliff; G McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A frequency importance function for continuous discourse.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; C V Pavlovic; R L Sherbecoe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency.

Authors:  B A Church; D L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  R C Bilger; J M Nuetzel; W M Rabinowitz; C Rzeczkowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

10.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.