Literature DB >> 25096109

Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.

Karen S Helfer1, Richard L Freyman1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine associations among hearing thresholds, cognitive ability, and speech understanding in adverse listening conditions within and between groups of younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Participants repeated back sentences played in the presence of several types of maskers (syntactically similar and syntactically different competing speech from one or two other talkers, and steady-state speech-shaped noise). They also completed tests of auditory short-term/working memory, processing speed, and inhibitory ability. Results showed that group differences in accuracy of word identification and in error patterns differed depending upon the number of masking voices; specifically, older and middle-aged individuals had particular difficulty, relative to younger subjects, in the presence of a single competing message. However, the effect of syntactic similarity was consistent across subject groups. Hearing loss, short-term memory, processing speed, and inhibitory ability were each related to some aspects of performance by the middle-aged and older participants. Notably, substantial age-related changes in speech recognition were apparent within the group of middle-aged listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096109      PMCID: PMC4187459          DOI: 10.1121/1.4887463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  53 in total

1.  Aging and speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.

Authors:  Douglas S Brungart; Peter S Chang; Brian D Simpson; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.

Authors:  Jessica Rossi-Katz; Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Maureen Coughlin
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

6.  A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Jae Hee Lee; Maureen P Coughlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Aging in binaural hearing begins in mid-life: evidence from cortical auditory-evoked responses to changes in interaural phase.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Takako Fujioka; Kelly L Tremblay; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  34 in total

1.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Early aging and postural control while listening and responding.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard van Emmerik; Jacob J Banks; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A New Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Informational Masking in Speech Perception Among Elderly Listeners.

Authors:  Marzieh Amiri; Farnoush Jarollahi; Shohreh Jalaie; Seyyed Jalal Sameni
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-21

4.  Lexical Influences on Errors in Masked Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Aging and the effect of target-masker alignment.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Gabrielle R Merchant; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Responses to Predictable versus Random Temporally Complex Stimuli from Single Units in Auditory Thalamus: Impact of Aging and Anesthesia.

Authors:  Rui Cai; Ben D Richardson; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Competing Speech Perception in Middle Age.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Temporal Processing Deficits in Middle Age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.