Literature DB >> 19116741

Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

In Ja Park1, Gyu-Seog Choi, Kyoung-Hoon Lim, Byung-Mo Kang, Soo-Han Jun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We consider quality of surgery throughout the learning curve and attempt to determine the learning curve for competency in performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
METHODS: The study included 1,014 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection between June 1996 and December 2007. We categorized patients into nine periods according to number of cases performed.
RESULTS: Operative time continuously decreased for right hemicolectomy (216 versus 150 min) and anterior resection (214.8 versus 147.7 min), whereas for low anterior resection it did not change over many periods and then significantly decreased after the ninth period (221.3 versus 176.4 min). The proportion of patients who had undergone previous abdominal surgery increased after the second period. Anastomotic leakage rate was 6-9% for the first 200 cases, and then decreased to less than 2%. More than 10% of operations were converted to open surgery during the first period, after which this rate significantly decreased to 2%. Number of harvested lymph nodes stabilized to 35-40 for right hemicolectomy after 200 cases, whereas for anterior and low anterior resection it was consistently 15-20 after the initial 20 cases. Overall, disease recurrence rate was 16-25%. For rectal cancer, local recurrence rate was highest (12%) in the fourth period and decreased thereafter to about 3%.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications and local recurrence rate increased even after accumulation of experience because of expansion of indications for laparoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19116741     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0259-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  28 in total

Review 1.  Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery.

Authors:  D A Rogers; A S Elstein; G Bordage
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients.

Authors:  S Delgado; D Momblán; L Salvador; R Bravo; A Castells; A Ibarzabal; J M Piqué; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  E Bärlehner; T Benhidjeb; S Anders; B Schicke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  A J Pikarsky; Y Saida; T Yamaguchi; S Martinez; W Chen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  For patients with Dukes' B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis.

Authors:  S Caplin; J P Cerottini; F T Bosman; M T Constanda; J C Givel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.

Authors:  David M Lawrence; Michael D Pasquale; Thomas E Wasser
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  42 in total

1.  Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Fabrizio Luca; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Sabina Cenciarelli; Wanda Petz; Igor Monsellato; Manuela Valvo; Maria Laura Cossu; Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Kassem Shmaissany
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Shady Ashamalla; Andy Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Surgeon's volume and number of lymph nodes in assessing colorectal cancer surgery and multimodal treatment quality.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Feroci; Andrea Vannucchi; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Stefano Cantafio; Alessia Garzi; Giampaolo Formisano; Marco Scatizzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The effect of proctoring on the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; J Stijns; H Pottel; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hajime Kayano; Junji Okuda; Keitaro Tanaka; Keisaku Kondo; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Tonia M Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The prevalence of laparoscopy and patient safety outcomes: an analysis of colorectal resections.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Kerrin Palazzi; J Kellogg Parsons; David C Chang; Sonia L Ramamoorthy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.