Literature DB >> 21476115

Impact of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery.

Tonia M Young-Fadok1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive techniques have had a marked impact on colorectal surgery despite the limited adoption of such techniques. Patients stay in the hospital a shorter time, experience less pain, and have less chance of developing a wound infection, an incisional hernia, a bowel obstruction, or difficulty becoming pregnant. Training courses have undergone metamorphosis from ad hoc animate courses to highly defined educational opportunities, and fellowships have had to respond to the educational demands of trainees demanding to be exposed to minimally invasive techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21476115     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1064-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  49 in total

1.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005.

Authors:  D Rattner; A Kalloo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

3.  Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon. Report of a case.

Authors:  M A Fusco; M W Paluzzi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Open surgery induces a dramatic decrease in circulating intact IGFBP-3 in patients with colorectal cancer not seen with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  I Kirman; V Cekic; N Poltoratskaia; P Sylla; S Jain; K A Forde; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost.

Authors:  E M Targarona; E Gracia; J Garriga; C Martínez-Bru; M Cortés; R Boluda; L Lerma; M Trías
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  J-C Kang; M-H Chung; P-C Chao; C-C Yeh; C-W Hsiao; T-Y Lee; S-W Jao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.