Literature DB >> 26811606

Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.

Roberto Biffi1, Fabrizio Luca1, Paolo Pietro Bianchi1, Sabina Cenciarelli1, Wanda Petz1, Igor Monsellato1, Manuela Valvo1, Maria Laura Cossu1, Tiago Leal Ghezzi1, Kassem Shmaissany1.   

Abstract

The laparoscopic approach for treatment of rectal cancer has been proven feasible and oncologically safe, and is able to offer better short-term outcomes than traditional open procedures, mainly in terms of reduced length of hospital stay and time to return to working activity. In spite of this, the laparoscopic technique is usually practised only in high-volume experienced centres, mainly because it requires a prolonged and demanding learning curve. It has been estimated that over 50 operations are required for an experienced colorectal surgeon to achieve proficiency with this technique. Robotic surgery enables the surgeon to perform minimally invasive operations with better vision and more intuitive and precise control of the operating instruments, thus promising to overcome some of the technical difficulties associated with standard laparoscopy. It has high-definition three-dimensional vision, it translates the surgeon's hand movements into precise movements of the instruments inside the patient, the camera is held and moved by the first surgeon, and a fourth robotic arm is available as a fixed retractor. The aim of this review is to summarise the current data on clinical and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted surgery in rectal cancer, focusing on short- and long-term results, and providing original data from the authors' centre.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumferential resection margin; Distal resection margin positivity; Lymph node yield; Rectal cancer; Robotic resection; Robotic surgery; Robotic total mesorectal excision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26811606      PMCID: PMC4716058          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  62 in total

1.  Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Richard Billingham; Ellen Farrokhi; Michael Florence; Daniel Herzig; Karen Horvath; Terry Rogers; Scott Steele; Rebecca Symons; Richard Thirlby; Mark Whiteford; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  [Total laparoscopic mesorectal excision versus robot-assisted in the treatment of rectal cancer: a meta-analysis].

Authors:  Ana María González Fernández; Juan Francisco Mascareñas González
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.653

Review 3.  Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature.

Authors:  S H Kim; J M Kwak
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Graziano Pernazza; Igor Monsellato; Vito Pende; Giorgio Lucandri; Paolo Mazzocchi; Giovanni Alfano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongzhi Yang; Feng Wang; Peng Zhang; Chenzhang Shi; Yang Zou; Huanlong Qin; Yanlei Ma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study.

Authors:  Min Soo Cho; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Min Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 2.  Evolution of Surgical Treatment for Rectal Cancer: a Review.

Authors:  Sanjeev Dayal; Nick Battersby; Tom Cecil
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Using psychological interventions in the nursing care of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sumin Wang; Huiqian Tian; Rongrong Xue
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Augmented Reality: Moving Robotics Forward.

Authors:  Nadine Hachach-Haram; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

Review 5.  Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Allison Weaver; Scott Steele
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26

6.  Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Yung-Sung Yeh; Wei-Chih Su; Ming-Yii Huang; Chun-Ming Huang; Yu-Tang Chang; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer: No surgery, minimal surgery or minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Joseph M Plummer; Pierre-Anthony Leake; Matthew R Albert
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-27

8.  Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Oliver Pickering; Hassan Abbas; Mick Harper; Ngianga Kandala; Nuno Figueiredo; Tahseen Qureshi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The perioperative dynamics of IL-7 following robot-assisted and open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka; Marek Zawadzki; Krzysztof Szufnarowski; Iwona Bednarz-Misa; Sabina Gorska; Wojciech Witkiewicz; Andrzej Gamian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jong Lyul Lee; Hassan A Alsaleem; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.