Literature DB >> 15973105

Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Paris P Tekkis1, Antony J Senagore, Conor P Delaney, Victor W Fazio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment.
METHODS: This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections.
RESULTS: The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P<0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973105      PMCID: PMC1357708          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results.

Authors:  Selim Dinçler; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Lucas M Bachmann; Daniel Christen; Peter Buchmann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

5.  Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve.

Authors:  A J Simons; G J Anthone; A E Ortega; M Franklin; J Fleshman; W P Geis; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster?

Authors:  F Agachan; J S Joo; M Sher; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intraoperative laparoscopic complications. Are we getting better?

Authors:  F Agachan; J S Joo; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Factors that predict conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Krishna Moorthy; Tracey Shaul; Robert J Foley
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  263 in total

1.  Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Janet F Y Lee; Simon S M Ng; Raymond Y C Yiu; Sophie S F Hon; Wing Wa Leung; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Amjad Parvaiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Assessment of the role of aptitude in the acquisition of advanced laparoscopic surgical skill sets: results from a virtual reality-based laparoscopic colectomy training programme.

Authors:  Emmeline Nugent; Hazem Hseino; Emily Boyle; Brian Mehigan; Kieran Ryan; Oscar Traynor; Paul Neary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Resident training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: role of the porcine model.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Carlo Caruso
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

8.  Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tim Killeen; Saswata Banerjee; Vardhini Vijay; Zaid Al-Dabbagh; Daren Francis; Steve Warren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Does the learning curve during laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect costs?

Authors:  Ravi P Kiran; Hasan T Kirat; Ersin Ozturk; Daniel P Geisler; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Learning curve of assistants in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: overcoming mirror imaging.

Authors:  Mi Ri Hwang; Guh Jung Seo; Sang Bum Yoo; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Jae Hwan Oh; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.