Literature DB >> 26491403

Adoption of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: It Was Quite a Journey.

Anthony J Senagore1.   

Abstract

The adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been a slow but steady progress. The first adopters rapidly expanded the application of the technology to all colorectal pathology. Issues related to extraction and port site recurrence of cancer delayed widespread adoption until incontrovertible data from well-powered prospective randomized studies confirmed equipoise with open surgery. Since that time, the data has consistently demonstrated patient-care benefits related to reductions in both short- and long-term complications historically associated with open colectomy. The potential for further improvement related to single-port access, robotic assistance, and natural orifice access for both the surgery and/or extraction will await the test of time. However, it is clear now that laparoscopic colorectal surgery is the new standard of care and a key enabler of enhanced recovery programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adoption; enhanced recovery; laparoscopy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26491403      PMCID: PMC4593902          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1560040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  52 in total

1.  Laparoscopic gastrointestinal and gallbladder surgery: will the promise be fulfilled?

Authors:  A Jansen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Yu Xia; Guo-qing Liao; Zhong-min Zhang; Sheng Liu; Yi Zhang; Zhong-shu Yan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Technique of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M J O'Reilly; W B Saye; S G Mullins; S E Pinto; P T Falkner
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1996-08

4.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  P M Falk; R W Beart; S D Wexner; A G Thorson; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; O B Johansen; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.

Authors:  P Vukasin; A E Ortega; F L Greene; G D Steele; A J Simons; G J Anthone; L A Weston; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Trocar site tumor recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy.

Authors:  M Fodera; M J Pello; U Atabek; R K Spence; J B Alexander; R C Camishion
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1995-08

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection. Evolution from an experimental technique to a standardized surgical procedure.

Authors:  A Jansen
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1994
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A critical appraisal of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for oncological and non-oncological resections.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Munir Ahmad Rathore; Mirza Khurrum Baig; Parv Sains
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-10

3.  A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Anthony J Senagore; Kathryn Fitch; Andrew Bochner; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Uptake of elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer in Canada from 2004/05 to 2014/15: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  C Marius Hoogerboord; Adrian R Levy; Min Hu; Gordon Flowerdew; Geoffrey Porter
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-18

5.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Jiejing Qiu; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.

Authors:  Kevin R Kasten; Adam C Celio; Lauren Trakimas; Mark L Manwaring; Konstantinos Spaniolas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Michele Manigrasso; Nunzio Velotti; Stefania Torino; Antonietta Vozza; Giovanni Sarnelli; Giovanni Aprea; Francesco Maione; Nicola Gennarelli; Mario Musella; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Niraj Parikh; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Current Status of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  James Fleshman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Inequalities in Implementation and Different Outcomes During the Growth of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in England: A National Population-Based Study from 2002 to 2012.

Authors:  B E Byrne; C A Vincent; O D Faiz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.