Literature DB >> 15868256

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature.

E Bärlehner1, T Benhidjeb, S Anders, B Schicke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are few reports on laparoscopic rectum resection demonstrating its feasibility and efficacy in patients with rectal cancer. Most patient series are small, and results must be considered preliminary and medium-term. Our large prospective conducted study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a totally laparoscopic resection for rectum carcinoma with emphasis on perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes.
METHODS: Between November 1992 and July 2003, 194 unselected patients were resected laparoscopically for rectal carcinoma. Patients with locally advanced rectum carcinoma (uT3/uT4) and no evidence of distant metastases were candidates for neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Adjuvant treatment was administered to patients with UICC stage II/III disease. All patients were followed up prospectively to evaluate complications and late outcomes. Survival probability analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Study selection was made by Medline search using the following key words: rectal cancer, rectal neoplasms, laparoscopy, and resection. Single case reports and abstracts were excluded. When surgical series were reported more than once, only the most recent reports were considered and listed.
RESULTS: The most common procedures were low anterior resection with total mesorectum excision in 65.5% of patients and high anterior resection in 25.3%. Average operative time was 174 min. Average number of lymph nodes removed was 25.4 and length of specimen resected was 27.6 cm. Resection was curative in 145 patients and palliative in 49 cases. UICC tumor stages were as follows: stage I: 25.2%, stage II: 27.3%, stage III: 30.4%, and stage IV: 17%. Intraoperative complications were <1% for lesions of the ureter, urinary bladder, and deferent duct. Conversion to conventional surgery was necessary in two cases (1%). The most common postoperative complication was anastomotic leakage in 13.5% of patients. There was no postoperative mortality. Follow-up evaluation ranged from 1 to 128 months with a mean of 46.1 months. The most common late complication was incisional hernia in 3.6% of patients. Port-site metastases occurred in one patient (0.5%). Tumor recurrence developed in 23 of the 145 curative resected patients (11.7% distant metastases and 4.1% local recurrence). Overall local recurrence rate was 6.7% (4.1% after curative resection and 14.3% after palliative resection). Overall survival rate was 90.6% at 1 year, 74.5% at 3 years, and 66.3% at 5 years. Overall 5-year survival rate was 76.9% after curative resection and 31.8% after palliative resection. Cancer-related survival rate was 94% at 1 year, 82.4% at 3 years, and 78.9% at 5 years. At 5 years it was 87.7% after curative resection and 48.5% after palliative resection. At 5 years, the survival rate was 100% for stage I, 94.4% for stage II, 66.6% for stage III, and 44.6% for stage IV.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results and the literature review clearly demonstrate that laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is not associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Established oncological and surgical principles are respected and long-term outcomes are at least as good as those after open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868256     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9134-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal cancer with preservation of anal sphincter: a report of 82 cases.

Authors:  Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhao Wang; Yong-Yang Yu; Ye Shu; Zhong Cheng; Li Li; Wen-Zhang Lei; Tian-Cai Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masahiko Watanabe; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  [Laparoscopic surgery of rectal carcinoma. Radical oncology and late results].

Authors:  E Bärlehner; T Decker; S Anders; B Heukrodt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.942

Review 5.  Laparoscopically assisted transsacral resection of rectal cancer with primary anastomosis. A preliminary review.

Authors:  D W Weaver; S R Eachempati
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

8.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  H Scheidbach; C Schneider; O Hügel; H Scheuerlein; E Bärlehner; J Konradt; C Wittekind; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients.

Authors:  Matthias Anthuber; Alois Fuerst; Florian Elser; Rita Berger; Karl-Walter Jauch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000-2009.

Authors:  Tsukasa Hotta; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Laparoscopic proctectomy after neoadjuvant therapy: safety and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Molly M Cone; Kim C Lu; Daniel O Herzig; Jennifer D Rea; Brian S Diggs; Samuel C Oommen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Totally laparoscopic low anterior resection with transperineal handsewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Person; D A Vivas; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; K Uehara; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Low section of the rectum during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision using the Contour device. Technical report.

Authors:  E M Targarona; C Balagué; R Berindoague; A Pey; C Martinez; P Hernandez; J Garriga; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  [Long-term oncological results after laparoscopic, converted and primary open procedures for rectal carcinoma. Results of a multicenter observational study].

Authors:  H Ptok; R Steinert; F Meyer; K-P Kröll; C Scheele; F Köckerling; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1,000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Kyoung-Hoon Lim; Byung-Mo Kang; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Meiki Fukuda; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Safety and learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Adam Abodeely; Jorge A Lagares-Garcia; Vincent Duron; Matthew Vrees
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-20

10.  Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  A H W Schiphorst; A Doeksen; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.