Literature DB >> 30560322

The effect of proctoring on the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

S H E M Clermonts1,2, Y T van Loon3, J Stijns3, H Pottel4, D K Wasowicz3, D D E Zimmerman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current method of choice for local resection of benign and selected malignant rectal tumors is transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) yields similar oncological results and better patient reported outcomes when compared to transanal endoscopic micro surgery. However, due to the technical complexity of TAMIS, a significant learning curve has been suggested. Data on the surgical learning curve are limited. The aim of our study was to investigate surgeon specific learning curves for TAMIS procedures for the local excision of selected rectal tumors, and analyze the effects of proctoring on operating time and outcome.
METHODS: The current study was prospective of all TAMIS procedures performed by two surgeons from October 2010 to November 2017. Margin positivity, specimen fragmentation, adverse events and operative time were evaluated with a cumulative sum analysis to determine the number of procedures required to reach proficiency. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to determine trends in changes over time.
RESULTS: The earliest adopter, surgeon A, performed 103 procedures, was not proctored and developed the standardized institutional program. Surgeon B, performed 26 cases, had the benefit of a proctorship and availability of a standardized program. The CUSUM curve for operative time showed a change after 36 cases for surgeon A and after 10 cases for surgeon B. For margin positivity proficiency was reached after 31 and 6 cases for surgeon A and B, respectively. The complications curve for surgeon A showed a three-phase learning curve with a decrease after the 26th case whereas surgeon B only had one (3.8%) complication in the learning phase with no change point in the CUSUM curve. Comparing pre- and post-proficiency periods there was a decrease in operating time for both surgeon A (84.4 ± 47.3 to 55.9 ± 30.1 min) and surgeon B (90.6 ± 64.to 53 ± 26.5 min; p < 0.001). Overall margin positivity rates decreased non significantly from 21.7 to 4.8% (p = 0.23). Complications were higher in the pre-proficiency period (21.7% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.02). Surgeon A had significantly more postoperative complications in pre-proficiency phase when compared to surgeon B (25% vs. none, p < 0.001), in the post-proficiency phase there was no statistically significant difference between both surgeons (p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that to reach satisfactory results for TAMIS, 18-31 procedures are required. Standardized institutional operative protocols together with proficient proctorship may contribute to a shorter learning curve with fewer cases (6-10) required to reach proficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Rectal cancer; TAMIS; TEMS; Transanal minimally invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30560322     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1910-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  30 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. A systematic review.

Authors:  C R Ramsay; A M Grant; S A Wallace; P H Garthwaite; A F Monk; I T Russell
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Cumulative sum failure analysis for eight surgeons performing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  David M Holzhey; Stephan Jacobs; Thomas Walther; Michael Mochalski; Friedrich W Mohr; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection.

Authors:  C Langer; T Liersch; M Süss; A Siemer; P Markus; B M Ghadimi; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation].

Authors:  G Buess; F Hutterer; J Theiss; M Böbel; W Isselhard; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Comparative Quality of Life in Patients Following Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery and Healthy Control Subjects.

Authors:  Stefan H E M Clermonts; Yu-Ting van Loon; Dareczka K Wasowicz; Barbara S Langenhoff; David D E Zimmerman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios Christoforidis; Hyeon-Min Cho; Matthew R Dixon; Anders F Mellgren; Robert D Madoff; Charles O Finne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term results of local excision for T1 rectal carcinoma: the experience of two colorectal units.

Authors:  Alexander Lebedyev; Hagit Tulchinsky; Micha Rabau; Joseph M Klausner; Michael Krausz; Simon D Duek
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Systematic review of learning curves for minimally invasive abdominal surgery: a review of the methodology of data collection, depiction of outcomes, and statistical analysis.

Authors:  Iliana J Harrysson; Jonathan Cook; Pramudith Sirimanna; Liane S Feldman; Ara Darzi; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jenifer Barrie; David G Jayne; Judy Wright; Carolyn J Czoski Murray; Fiona J Collinson; Sue H Pavitt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  5 in total

1.  TAMIS is a valuable alternative to TEM for resection of intraluminal rectal tumors.

Authors:  F Van den Eynde; J Jaekers; S Fieuws; A M D'Hoore; A M Wolthuis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Transanal Endoscopic Surgery: Who Should Be Doing This Procedure?

Authors:  François Rouleau Fournier; Carl James Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 3.  Transanal Endoscopic Platforms: TAMIS versus Rigid Platforms: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Liam A Devane; Meghan C Daly; Matthew R Albert
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 4.  Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; F Borja de Lacy; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Novel box trainer for taTME - prospective evaluation among medical students.

Authors:  Jakob Mann; Jens Rolinger; Steffen Axt; Andreas Kirschniak; Peter Wilhelm
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2019-10-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.