Literature DB >> 9006551

The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

C L Bennett1, S J Stryker, M R Ferreira, J Adams, R W Beart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy is an emerging technology for patients with cancer, polyps, inflammation, and other types of pathologic conditions. While previous studies have shown better outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomies when surgeons perform more procedures, there is no information on the relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether better clinical outcomes are found for surgeons who perform higher numbers of laparoscopic-assisted colectomies and whether such a relationship, if it exists, applies to both intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
DESIGN: Analysis of a data set of 1194 patients, operated on by 114 surgeons, from a prospective registry sponsored by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, from May 1991 to October 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion rate, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: In 75% of cases, surgery was completed laparoscopically, with no difference between high-volume surgeons (> or = 40 cases) and low-volume surgeons. Length of stay (average, 6 days) did not vary according to surgeon volume. Postoperative complications occurred in 15% of cases, with a significantly lower rate for high-volume surgeons (10% vs 19%; P < .001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 5% of cases, with a nonsignificant trend toward a lower rate for high-volume surgeons (3.7% vs 6.3%). A multivariate regression analysis, adjusting for type of disease (cancer vs inflammation vs polyps) and for level of difficulty of the procedure (high vs low) showed that for high-volume surgeons there is a lower probability of both intraoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.97; P = .04) and postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.68; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a learning curve for laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with respect to intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. As with other laparoscopic procedures, surgeons who perform higher volumes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy have lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006551     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250043009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  94 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the cost for laparoscopic-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy.

Authors:  Y Adachi; N Shiraishi; K Ikebe; M Aramaki; T Bandoh; S Kitano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Janet F Y Lee; Simon S M Ng; Raymond Y C Yiu; Sophie S F Hon; Wing Wa Leung; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Should carcinoma of the colon be treated laparoscopically? Point.

Authors:  R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?

Authors:  O E Aly; Z Quayyum
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A prospective study demonstrating the reliability and validity of two procedure-specific evaluation tools to assess operative competence in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic Colectomy and the General Surgeon.

Authors:  Jesse Moore; Andrew Pellet; Neil Hyman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Joseph Mamazza; Roger Gregoire; Stephen E Burpee; Eric C Poulin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  Laparoscopic surgery for crohn disease: a brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Cary B Aarons
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.