Literature DB >> 19014263

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Lisa A Parr1, Matthew Heintz, Gauri Pradhan.   

Abstract

Faces are salient stimuli for primates that rely predominantly on visual cues for recognizing conspecifics and maintaining social relationships. While previous studies have shown similar face discrimination processes in chimpanzees and humans, data from monkeys are unclear. Therefore, three studies examined face processing in rhesus monkeys using the face inversion effect, a fractured face task, and an individual recognition task. Unlike chimpanzees and humans, the monkeys showed a general face inversion effect reflected by significantly better performance on upright compared to inverted faces (conspecifics, human and chimpanzees faces) regardless of the subjects' expertise with those categories. Fracturing faces alters first- and second-order configural manipulations whereas previous studies in chimpanzees showed selective deficits for second-order configural manipulations. Finally, when required to individuate conspecific's faces, i.e., matching two different photographs of the same conspecific, monkeys showed poor discrimination and repeated training. These results support evolutionary differences between rhesus monkeys and Hominoids in the importance of configural cues and their ability to individuate conspecifics' faces, suggesting a lack of face expertise in rhesus monkeys. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19014263      PMCID: PMC2859434          DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  47 in total

1.  Becoming a face expert.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Sara Ahola
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-11

2.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  L A Parr; J T Winslow; W D Hopkins; F B de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Izzat Jarudi; Sharon Gilad; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage.

Authors:  J W. Peirce; A E. Leigh; A P.C. daCosta; K M. Kendrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?

Authors:  Stephan M Collishaw; Graham J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Sheep don't forget a face.

Authors:  K M Kendrick; A P da Costa; A E Leigh; M R Hinton; J W Peirce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Imitation in neonatal chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Masako Myowa-Yamakoshi; Masaki Tomonaga; Masayuki Tanaka; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2004-09

10.  Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys.

Authors:  B A Vermeire; C R Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  29 in total

1.  Visual kin recognition in nonhuman primates: (Pan troglodytes and Macaca mulatta): inbreeding avoidance or male distinctiveness?

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Elizabeth Lonsdorf; Emily Wroblewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  First- and second-order configural sensitivity for greeble stimuli in baboons.

Authors:  Carole Parron; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Facial musculature in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta): evolutionary and functional contexts with comparisons to chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Anne M Burrows; Bridget M Waller; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Assessing the potential information content of multicomponent visual signals: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  William L Allen; James P Higham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle; Molly Flessert; David A Leopold; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The Thatcher illusion in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Christoph D Dahl; Nikos K Logothetis; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Neural correlates of face and object perception in an awake chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) examined by scalp-surface event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hirokata Fukushima; Satoshi Hirata; Ari Ueno; Goh Matsuda; Kohki Fuwa; Keiko Sugama; Kiyo Kusunoki; Masahiro Hirai; Kazuo Hiraki; Masaki Tomonaga; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Face processing in the chimpanzee brain.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Erin Hecht; Sarah K Barks; Todd M Preuss; John R Votaw
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.