Literature DB >> 28803877

Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey.

Jessica Taubert1, Susan G Wardle2, Molly Flessert3, David A Leopold4, Leslie G Ungerleider3.   

Abstract

Face perception in humans and nonhuman primates is rapid and accurate [1-4]. In the human brain, a network of visual-processing regions is specialized for faces [5-7]. Although face processing is a priority of the primate visual system, face detection is not infallible. Face pareidolia is the compelling illusion of perceiving facial features on inanimate objects, such as the illusory face on the surface of the moon. Although face pareidolia is commonly experienced by humans, its presence in other species is unknown. Here we provide evidence for face pareidolia in a species known to possess a complex face-processing system [8-10]: the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). In a visual preference task [11, 12], monkeys looked longer at photographs of objects that elicited face pareidolia in human observers than at photographs of similar objects that did not elicit illusory faces. Examination of eye movements revealed that monkeys fixated the illusory internal facial features in a pattern consistent with how they view photographs of faces [13]. Although the specialized response to faces observed in humans [1, 3, 5-7, 14] is often argued to be continuous across primates [4, 15], it was previously unclear whether face pareidolia arose from a uniquely human capacity. For example, pareidolia could be a product of the human aptitude for perceptual abstraction or result from frequent exposure to cartoons and illustrations that anthropomorphize inanimate objects. Instead, our results indicate that the perception of illusory facial features on inanimate objects is driven by a broadly tuned face-detection mechanism that we share with other species. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye movements; face detection; face perception; monkey behavior; visual preference

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28803877      PMCID: PMC5584612          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  40 in total

1.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Igor V Bondar; Martin A Giese
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Nancy Kanwisher; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline.

Authors:  M H Johnson; S Dziurawiec; H Ellis; J Morton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-08

4.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Goedele Van Belle; Wim Vanduffel; Bruno Rossion; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Seeing two faces together: preference formation in humans and rhesus macaques.

Authors:  David Méary; Zhihan Li; Wu Li; Kun Guo; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?

Authors:  Olivier Pascalis; Michelle de Haan; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  How macaques view familiarity and gaze in conspecific faces.

Authors:  Timothy K Leonard; Galit Blumenthal; Katalin M Gothard; Kari L Hoffman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces.

Authors:  Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Two fixations suffice in face recognition.

Authors:  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao; Garrison Cottrell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10
View more
  21 in total

1.  Recognition Memory in Marmoset and Macaque Monkeys: A Comparison of Active Vision.

Authors:  Samuel U Nummela; Michael J Jutras; John T Wixted; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Cory T Miller
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Amygdala lesions eliminate viewing preferences for faces in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Molly Flessert; Susan G Wardle; Benjamin M Basile; Aidan P Murphy; Elisabeth A Murray; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Human and monkey infant attention to dynamic social and nonsocial stimuli.

Authors:  Sarah E Maylott; Annika Paukner; Yeojin A Ahn; Elizabeth A Simpson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  A visual search advantage for illusory faces in objects.

Authors:  Robert T Keys; Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The involvement of monocular channels in the face pareidolia effect.

Authors:  Keren Leadner; Silvart Arabian; Shai Gabay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Single-Unit Recordings Reveal the Selectivity of a Human Face Area.

Authors:  Thomas Decramer; Elsie Premereur; Qi Zhu; Wim Van Paesschen; Johannes van Loon; Wim Vanduffel; Jessica Taubert; Peter Janssen; Tom Theys
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Clutter substantially reduces selectivity for peripheral faces in the macaque brain.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle; Clarissa T Tardiff; Amanda Patterson; David Yu; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  Rapid and dynamic processing of face pareidolia in the human brain.

Authors:  Susan G Wardle; Jessica Taubert; Lina Teichmann; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Neural mechanisms underlying visual pareidolia processing: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Gulsum Akdeniz; Sila Toker; Ibrahim Atli
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia.

Authors:  David Alais; Yiben Xu; Susan G Wardle; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.