Literature DB >> 17176421

Becoming a face expert.

Catherine J Mondloch1, Daphne Maurer, Sara Ahola.   

Abstract

Expertise in recognizing facial identity, and, in particular, sensitivity to subtle differences in the spacing among facial features, improves into adolescence. To assess the influence of experience, we tested adults and 8-year-olds with faces differing only in the spacing of facial features. Stimuli were human adult, human 8-year-old, and monkey faces. We show that adults' expertise is shaped by experience: They were 9% more accurate in seeing differences in the spacing of features in upright human faces than in upright monkey faces. Eight-year-olds were 14% less accurate than adults for both human and monkey faces (Experiment 1), and their accuracy for human faces was not higher for children's faces than for adults' faces (Experiment 2). The results indicate that improvements in face recognition after age 8 are not related to experience with human faces and may be related to general improvements in memory or in perception (e.g., hyperacuity and spatial integration).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17176421     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01806.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  29 in total

1.  Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience.

Authors:  Guomei Zhou; Zhijie Cheng; Xudong Zhang; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Perceptual specialization and configural face processing in infancy.

Authors:  Nicole Zieber; Ashley Kangas; Alyson Hock; Angela Hayden; Rebecca Collins; Henrietta Bada; Jane E Joseph; Ramesh S Bhatt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08-28

3.  Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Mapping social target detection with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gabriel S Dichter; Jennifer N Felder; James W Bodfish; Linmarie Sikich; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

6.  Age-related changes in matching novel objects across viewpoints.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Yaroslav Konar; Quoc C Vuong; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Multisensory convergence of visual and haptic object preference across development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Developmental prosopagnosia in childhood.

Authors:  Kirsten A Dalrymple; Sherryse Corrow; Albert Yonas; Brad Duchaine
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Neural Trade-Offs between Recognizing and Categorizing Own- and Other-Race Faces.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Zhe Wang; Lu Feng; Jun Li; Jie Tian; Kang Lee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Paul C Quinn; Buyun Xu; Kim Maynard; Natalie Huxtable; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.