Literature DB >> 11390088

Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage.

J W. Peirce1, A E. Leigh, A P.C. daCosta, K M. Kendrick.   

Abstract

Face recognition in sheep is qualitatively similar to that in humans in terms of its left visual field bias, and the effects of expertise and configural coding. The current study was designed to determine whether such effects are species specific by investigating the case of sheep recognising humans. It was found that the sheep could identify human faces and while they showed a small inversion-induced decline in discriminatory performance, this was significantly less than seen with sheep faces. In other aspects, there were qualitative differences with human face recognition compared with conspecific recognition. In contrast with sheep faces there was no left visual field advantage in the recognition of human faces and the internal features were not used at all as visual cues. The data suggest that these sheep, whilst being extensively exposed to interactions with humans, were unable to identify them with all the same 'expert' methods as were used to discriminate other sheep. This suggests that different neural systems may, to some extent, be used for recognition of sheep as opposed to human faces. The relative contribution to differential neural processing of the faces of the different species and the role of expertise are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11390088     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00158-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  17 in total

Review 1.  Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals.

Authors:  Andrew J Tate; Hanno Fischer; Andrea E Leigh; Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Unoma Akamagwuna
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Longitudinal In Vivo Monitoring of the CNS Demonstrates the Efficacy of Gene Therapy in a Sheep Model of CLN5 Batten Disease.

Authors:  Nadia L Mitchell; Katharina N Russell; Martin P Wellby; Hollie E Wicky; Lucia Schoderboeck; Graham K Barrell; Tracy R Melzer; Steven J Gray; Stephanie M Hughes; David N Palmer
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  How humans differ from other animals in their levels of morphological variation.

Authors:  Ann E McKellar; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The evolution of holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Darren Burke; Danielle Sulikowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31

8.  Individual recognition in domestic cattle (Bos taurus): evidence from 2D-images of heads from different breeds.

Authors:  Marjorie Coulon; Bertrand L Deputte; Yvan Heyman; Claude Baudoin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceptual asymmetries and handedness: a neglected link?

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Giulia Prete; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-28

10.  Discrimination of familiar human faces in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Ludwig Huber; Anaïs Racca; Billy Scaf; Zsófia Virányi; Friederike Range
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.