Literature DB >> 21536556

The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Anthony P Atkinson1, Ralph Adolphs.   

Abstract

Face processing relies on a distributed, patchy network of cortical regions in the temporal and frontal lobes that respond disproportionately to face stimuli, other cortical regions that are not even primarily visual (such as somatosensory cortex), and subcortical structures such as the amygdala. Higher-level face perception abilities, such as judging identity, emotion and trustworthiness, appear to rely on an intact face-processing network that includes the occipital face area (OFA), whereas lower-level face categorization abilities, such as discriminating faces from objects, can be achieved without OFA, perhaps via the direct connections to the fusiform face area (FFA) from several extrastriate cortical areas. Some lesion, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) findings argue against a strict feed-forward hierarchical model of face perception, in which the OFA is the principal and common source of input for other visual and non-visual cortical regions involved in face perception, including the FFA, face-selective superior temporal sulcus and somatosensory cortex. Instead, these findings point to a more interactive model in which higher-level face perception abilities depend on the interplay between several functionally and anatomically distinct neural regions. Furthermore, the nature of these interactions may depend on the particular demands of the task. We review the lesion and TMS literature on this topic and highlight the dynamic and distributed nature of face processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536556      PMCID: PMC3130374          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  117 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas.

Authors:  E T Rolls
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Corticomotor responses to triple-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: Effects of interstimulus interval and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Paul Sacco; Duncan Turner; John Rothwell; Gary Thickbroom
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception.

Authors:  Scott L Fairhall; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  TMS in cognitive neuroscience: virtual lesion and beyond.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Event-related repetitive TMS reveals distinct, critical roles for right OFA and bilateral posterior STS in judging the sex and trustworthiness of faces.

Authors:  Milena P Dzhelyova; Amanda Ellison; Anthony P Atkinson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Impaired face discrimination in acquired prosopagnosia is associated with abnormal response to individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  Christine Schiltz; Bettina Sorger; Roberto Caldara; Fatima Ahmed; Eugene Mayer; Rainer Goebel; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: an fMRI adaptation study.

Authors:  Christopher J Fox; So Young Moon; Giuseppe Iaria; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: neuropsychological evidence.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; N Donnelly; M J Riddoch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Contributions of the amygdala to reward expectancy and choice signals in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alan N Hampton; Ralph Adolphs; Michael J Tyszka; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area.

Authors:  Jennifer K E Steeves; Jody C Culham; Bradley C Duchaine; Cristiana Cavina Pratesi; Kenneth F Valyear; Igor Schindler; G Keith Humphrey; A David Milner; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  60 in total

1.  Is a neutral expression also a neutral stimulus? A study with functional magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Fernando Carvajal; Sandra Rubio; Juan M Serrano; Marcos Ríos-Lago; Juan Alvarez-Linera; Lara Pacheco; Pilar Martín
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Emotion recognition deficits as predictors of transition in individuals at clinical high risk for schizophrenia: a neurodevelopmental perspective.

Authors:  C M Corcoran; J G Keilp; J Kayser; C Klim; P D Butler; G E Bruder; R C Gur; D C Javitt
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Brain activation in response to overt and covert fear and happy faces in women with borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Kathryn R Cullen; Lori L LaRiviere; Nathalie Vizueta; Kathleen M Thomas; Ruskin H Hunt; Michael J Miller; Kelvin O Lim; Sellman C Schulz
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  When you smile, the world smiles at you: ERP evidence for self-expression effects on face processing.

Authors:  Alejandra Sel; Beatriz Calvo-Merino; Simone Tuettenberg; Bettina Forster
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Sensorimotor simulation and emotion processing: Impairing facial action increases semantic retrieval demands.

Authors:  Joshua D Davis; Piotr Winkielman; Seana Coulson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Cerebral responses to self-initiated action during social interactions.

Authors:  Wuyi Wang; Simon Zhornitsky; Clara S-P Li; Sheng Zhang; Jaime S Ide; Jutta Joormann; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Neural Trade-Offs between Recognizing and Categorizing Own- and Other-Race Faces.

Authors:  Jiangang Liu; Zhe Wang; Lu Feng; Jun Li; Jie Tian; Kang Lee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The emotional homunculus: ERP evidence for independent somatosensory responses during facial emotional processing.

Authors:  Alejandra Sel; Bettina Forster; Beatriz Calvo-Merino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.

Authors:  Chiara Ferrari; Susanna Schiavi; Zaira Cattaneo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Network Configurations in the Human Brain Reflect Choice Bias during Rapid Face Processing.

Authors:  Tao Tu; Noam Schneck; Jordan Muraskin; Paul Sajda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.