Literature DB >> 7790837

What causes the face inversion effect?

M J Farah1, J W Tanaka, H M Drain.   

Abstract

What is it about the way faces are represented by the visual system that makes them so much harder to recognize when inverted? The authors tested the hypothesis that the "face inversion" effect results from the use of holistic shape representations. This suggests that the susceptibility of nonface patterns to inversion should be a function of their degree of part decomposition. In Experiment 1 this was tested and confirmed with dot patterns in which the degree of part decomposition was manipulated by grouping and segregation on the basis of dot color. The hypothesis also predicted that the face inversion effect can be eliminated with face stimuli if participants are induced to recognize the faces in terms of their component parts. In Experiment 2 this was tested and confirmed with whole, intact faces, in which the degree of part decomposition was manipulated by allowing participants to study them, initially, in either whole, intact versions or versions with parts presented separately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790837     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  127 in total

1.  Influences of spontaneous perspective taking on spatial and identity processing of faces.

Authors:  Anne Böckler; Jan Zwickel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The perception of visible speech: estimation of speech rate and detection of time reversals.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesca Figliozzi; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces.

Authors:  Rama Amishav; Ruth Kimchi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Postencoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition.

Authors:  Michael R Ho; Kathy Pezdek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

5.  The influence of natural contour and face size on the spatial frequency tuning for identifying upright and inverted faces.

Authors:  Jessica Royer; Verena Willenbockel; Caroline Blais; Frédéric Gosselin; Sandra Lafortune; Josiane Leclerc; Daniel Fiset
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-02

6.  The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification.

Authors:  Lun Zhao; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Allocentric kin recognition is not affected by facial inversion.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Lisa M DeBruine; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Frontal contributions to face processing differences in autism: evidence from fMRI of inverted face processing.

Authors:  Susan Y Bookheimer; A Ting Wang; Ashley Scott; Marian Sigman; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.