Literature DB >> 10739311

Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

L A Parr1, J T Winslow, W D Hopkins, F B de Waal.   

Abstract

Faces are one of the most salient classes of stimuli involved in social communication. Three experiments compared face-recognition abilities in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). In the face-matching task, the chimpanzees matched identical photographs of conspecifics' faces on Trial 1, and the rhesus monkeys did the same after 4 generalization trials. In the individual-recognition task, the chimpanzees matched 2 different photographs of the same individual after 2 trials, and the rhesus monkeys generalized in fewer than 6 trials. The feature-masking task showed that the eyes were the most important cue for individual recognition. Thus, chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys are able to use facial cues to discriminate unfamiliar conspecifics. Although the rhesus monkeys required many trials to learn the tasks, this is not evidence that faces are not as important social stimuli for them as for the chimpanzees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739311      PMCID: PMC2018744          DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  31 in total

1.  Testing primates with joystick-based automated apparatus: lessons from the Language Research Center's Computerized Test System.

Authors:  D A Washburn; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1992

2.  EVOLUTION OF FACIAL EXPRESSION.

Authors:  R J ANDREW
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Analysis of matching behavior in chimpanzee.

Authors:  H W NISSEN; J S BLUM; R A BLUM
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

Review 4.  Homologizing primate facial displays: a critical review of methods.

Authors:  S Preuschoft; J A van Hooff
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus).

Authors:  S Savage-Rumbaugh; K McDonald; R A Sevcik; W D Hopkins; E Rubert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-09

6.  The reaction of monkeys to 'fearsome' pictures.

Authors:  N K Humphrey; G R Keeble
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Communication of affects between feral and socially isolated monkeys.

Authors:  R E Miller; W F Caul; I A Mirsky
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1967-11

8.  Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  M R D'Amato; D P Salmon; M Colombo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-01

9.  How do monkeys look at faces?

Authors:  F K Nahm; A Perret; D G Amaral; T D Albright
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Planum temporale asymmetries in great apes as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  W D Hopkins; L Marino; J K Rilling; L A MacGregor
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-08-24       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  73 in total

1.  Visual kin recognition in nonhuman primates: (Pan troglodytes and Macaca mulatta): inbreeding avoidance or male distinctiveness?

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Elizabeth Lonsdorf; Emily Wroblewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Amygdala volume predicts patterns of eye fixation in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Pamela L Noble; James T Winslow; Daniel S Pine; Eric E Nelson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Longer fixation duration while viewing face images.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Sasan Mahmoodi; Robert G Robertson; Malcolm P Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A case of infant swapping by wild northern muriquis (Brachyteles hypoxanthus).

Authors:  Waldney Pereira Martins; Vanessa de Oliveira Guimarães; Karen B Strier
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  You sound familiar: carrion crows can differentiate between the calls of known and unknown heterospecifics.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Georgine Szipl; Markus Boeckle; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  The neuroethology of friendship.

Authors:  Lauren J N Brent; Steve W C Chang; Jean-François Gariépy; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The default mode network in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) is similar to that of humans.

Authors:  Sarah K Barks; Lisa A Parr; James K Rilling
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Group and kin recognition via olfactory cues in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Stefanie Henkel; Joanna M Setchell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Monkeys recognize the faces of group mates in photographs.

Authors:  Jennifer J Pokorny; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Neuroethology of decision-making.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Adams; Karli K Watson; John Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.