Literature DB >> 11954691

Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?

Stephan M Collishaw1, Graham J Hole.   

Abstract

Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were asked to discriminate blurred famous and unfamiliar faces presented at nine angles. Blurred faces were used to minimise featural processing strategies, and to assess the effects of rotation that are specific to configural processing. The results indicate a linear relationship between angle of rotation and recognition accuracy. It appears that configural processing becomes gradually more disrupted the further a face is oriented away from the upright. The implications of these findings for competing explanations of the face-inversion effect are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11954691     DOI: 10.1068/p3195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Determinants of range effects in face recognition.

Authors:  Eric L Verbeek; Marcia L Spetch; Ken Cheng; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Holistic face representation is highly orientation-specific.

Authors:  Gideon Rosenthal; Gidon Levakov; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Effect of familiarity and viewpoint on face recognition in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Erin Siebert; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Unoma Akamagwuna
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Crying the blues: The configural processing of infant face emotions and its association with postural biases.

Authors:  Gianluca Malatesta; Valerio Manippa; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  From upright to upside-down presentation: a spatio-temporal ERP study of the parametric effect of rotation on face and house processing.

Authors:  Boutheina Jemel; Julie Coutya; Caroline Langer; Sylvain Roy
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  The evolution of holistic processing of faces.

Authors:  Darren Burke; Danielle Sulikowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.