Literature DB >> 18975714

Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.

Kathrine G Metheany1, Craig K Abbey, Nathan Packard, John M Boone.   

Abstract

Previous work [Burgess et al., Med. Phys. 28, 419-437 (2001)] has shown that anatomical noise in projection mammography results in a power spectrum well modeled over a range of frequencies by a power law, and the exponent (beta) of this power law plays a critical role in determining the size at which a growing lesion reaches the threshold for detection. In this study, the authors evaluated the power-law model for breast computed tomography (bCT) images, which can be thought of as thin sections through a three-dimensional (3D) volume. Under the assumption of a 3D power law describing the distribution of attenuation coefficients in the breast parenchyma, the authors derived the relationship between the power-law exponents of bCT and projection images and found it to be betasection=betaproj-1. They evaluated this relationship on clinical images by comparing bCT images from a set of 43 patients to Burgess' findings in mammography. They were able to make a direct comparison for 6 of these patients who had both a bCT exam and a digitized film-screen mammogram. They also evaluated segmented bCT images to investigate the extent to which the bCT power-law exponent can be explained by a binary model of attenuation coefficients based on the different attenuation of glandular and adipose tissue. The power-law model was found to be a good fit for bCT data over frequencies from 0.07 to 0.45 cyc/mm, where anatomical variability dominates the spectrum. The average exponent for bCT images was 1.86. This value is close to the theoretical prediction using Burgess' published data for projection mammography and for the limited set of mammography data available from the authors' patient sample. Exponents from the segmented bCT images (average value: 2.06) were systematically slightly higher than bCT images, with substantial correlation between the two (r=0.84).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18975714      PMCID: PMC3304474          DOI: 10.1118/1.2977772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  26 in total

1.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses.

Authors:  M P Eckstein; C K Abbey; F O Bochud
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Nelson; K K Lindfors; J A Seibert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors.

Authors:  John J Heine; Poonam Malhotra
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data.

Authors:  John J Heine; Robert P Velthuizen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Figures of merit for detectors in digital radiography. I. Flat background and deterministic blurring.

Authors:  Angel R Pineda; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone; N Shah; T R Nelson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The influence of structured noise on the detection of radiologic abnormalities.

Authors:  G Revesz; H L Kundel; M A Graber
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Pamela K Isaacs; Virginia Vance; Fred J Larke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  41 in total

1.  Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa; M L Giger; J M Boone; K K Lindfors; K Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  On the orientation of mammographic structure.

Authors:  I Reiser; S Lee; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging.

Authors:  P Prakash; W Zbijewski; G J Gang; Y Ding; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Beyond noise power in 3D computed tomography: the local NPS and off-diagonal elements of the Fourier domain covariance matrix.

Authors:  Angel R Pineda; Daniel J Tward; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  G J Gang; D J Tward; J Lee; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A Statistical Model for Rigid Image Registration Performance: The Influence of Soft-Tissue Deformation as a Confounding Noise Source.

Authors:  Michael D Ketcha; Tharindu De Silva; Runze Han; Ali Uneri; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  An X-Ray computed tomography/positron emission tomography system designed specifically for breast imaging.

Authors:  John M Boone; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Nathan J Packard; Shih-ying Huang; Spencer Bowen; Ramsey D Badawi; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02

8.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sean D Rose; Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Synthetic breast phantoms from patient based eigenbreasts.

Authors:  Gregory M Sturgeon; Subok Park; William Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.