Literature DB >> 14617762

Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Jennifer A Harvey1, Viktor E Bovbjerg.   

Abstract

Increased mammographic breast density is a moderate independent risk factor for breast cancer, with findings of published studies in which quantitative methods of assessment were used showing a positive association. Breast density may be quantified by using visual assessment or planimetry. Although the category definitions vary, the odds ratio for developing breast cancer for the most dense compared with the least dense breast tissue categories ranges from 1.8 to 6.0, with most studies yielding an odds ratio of 4.0 or greater. Plausible explanations for the association of breast density with increased breast cancer risk may be the development of premalignant lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, elevated growth factors, or increased estrogen production within the breast due to overactive aromatase. The amount of breast density may be due in part to genetic heredity. However, unlike other risk factors, breast density may be influenced. Specifically, breast density is very hormonally responsive and potentially may be influenced by lifestyle factors such as alcohol intake and diet. Assessment of breast density may become useful in risk assessment and prevention decisions. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14617762     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2301020870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  126 in total

1.  Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences.

Authors:  Daniel H-E Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Muqing Lin; Shadfar Bahri; Hon J Yu; Rita S Mehta; Ke Nie; David J B Hsiang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Statistical analysis of mammographic breast composition measurements: towards a quantitative measure of relative breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Three-dimensional microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms via a multiple-frequency inverse scattering technique.

Authors:  Jacob D Shea; Panagiotis Kosmas; Susan C Hagness; Barry D Van Veen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.

Authors:  A S Tagliafico; G Tagliafico; F Cavagnetto; M Calabrese; N Houssami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Histologic changes in the breast with menopausal hormone therapy use: correlation with breast density, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and proliferation indices.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Richard J Santen; Gina R Petroni; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Mark E Smolkin; Fathima S Sheriff; Jose Russo
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Man-Kwun I Chau; Hon J Yu; Shadfar Bahri; Tiffany Tseng; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Charlotte C Gard; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta A Geller; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.