Literature DB >> 12033559

Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data.

John J Heine1, Robert P Velthuizen.   

Abstract

The spectral content of mammograms acquired from using a full field digital mammography (FFDM) system are analyzed. Fourier methods are used to show that the FFDM image power spectra obey an inverse power law; in an average sense, the images may be considered as 1/f fields. Two data representations are analyzed and compared (1) the raw data, and (2) the logarithm of the raw data. Two methods are employed to analyze the power spectra (1) a technique based on integrating the Fourier plane with octave ring sectioning developed previously, and (2) an approach based on integrating the Fourier plane using rings of constant width developed for this work. Both methods allow theoretical modeling. Numerical analysis indicates that the effects due to the transformation influence the power spectra measurements in a statistically significant manner in the high frequency range. However, this effect has little influence on the inverse power law estimation for a given image regardless of the data representation or the theoretical analysis approach. The analysis is presented from two points of view (1) each image is treated independently with the results presented as distributions, and (2) for a given representation, the entire image collection is treated as an ensemble with the results presented as expected values. In general, the constant ring width analysis forms the foundation for a spectral comparison method for finding spectral differences, from an image distribution sense, after applying a nonlinear transformation to the data. The work also shows that power law estimation may be influenced due to the presence of noise in the higher frequency range, which is consistent with the known attributes of the detector efficiency. The spectral modeling and inverse power law determinations obtained here are in agreement with that obtained from the analysis of digitized film-screen images presented previously. The form of the power spectrum for a given image is approximately l/f2beta with beta approximately 1.4-1.5.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12033559     DOI: 10.1118/1.1445410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT.

Authors:  G J Gang; D J Tward; J Lee; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yuanjie Zheng; Brad M Keller; Shonket Ray; Yan Wang; Emily F Conant; James C Gee; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; Anita Nosratieh; Karen K Lindfors; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Calibrated measures for breast density estimation.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Dana E Rollison
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Generalized breast density metrics.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Autumn Smallwood; Cassandra Miltich; Jennifer Drukteinis; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Spatial Correlation and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Cassandra Hathaway; Fabryann Tillman; Robert Weinfurtner; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-05-22

10.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.