Literature DB >> 23422272

Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Lin Chen1, Craig K Abbey, John M Boone.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that a parameter extracted from a power function fit to the anatomical noise power spectrum, β, may be predictive of breast mass lesion detectability in x-ray based medical images of the breast. In this investigation, the value of β was compared with a number of other more widely used parameters, in order to determine the relationship between β and these other parameters. This study made use of breast CT data sets, acquired on two breast CT systems developed in our laboratory. A total of 185 breast data sets in 183 women were used, and only the unaffected breast was used (where no lesion was suspected). The anatomical noise power spectrum computed from two-dimensional region of interests (ROIs), was fit to a power function (NPS(f) = α f(-β)), and the exponent parameter (β) was determined using log/log linear regression. Breast density for each of the volume data sets was characterized in previous work. The breast CT data sets analyzed in this study were part of a previous study which evaluated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve performance using simulated spherical lesions and a pre-whitened matched filter computer observer. This ROC information was used to compute the detectability index as well as the sensitivity at 95% specificity. The fractal dimension was computed from the same ROIs which were used for the assessment of β. The value of β was compared to breast density, detectability index, sensitivity, and fractal dimension, and the slope of these relationships was investigated to assess statistical significance from zero slope. A statistically significant non-zero slope was considered to be a positive association in this investigation. All comparisons between β and breast density, detectability index, sensitivity at 95% specificity, and fractal dimension demonstrated statistically significant association with p < 0.001 in all cases. The value of β was also found to be associated with patient age and breast diameter, parameters both related to breast density. In all associations between other parameters, lower values of β were associated with increased breast cancer detection performance. Specifically, lower values of β were associated with lower breast density, higher detectability index, higher sensitivity, and lower fractal dimension values. While causality was not and probably cannot be demonstrated, the strong, statistically significant association between the β metric and the other more widely used parameters suggest that β may be considered as a surrogate measure for breast cancer detection performance. These findings are specific to breast parenchymal patterns and mass lesions only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23422272      PMCID: PMC3653437          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds.

Authors:  F O Bochud; J F Valley; F R Verdun; C Hessler; P Schnyder
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.

Authors:  Oleg Tischenko; Christoph Hoeschen; David R Dance; Roger A Hunt; Andrew D A Maidment; Predrag R Bakic
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Estimation of fractal dimension of parenchymal organs based on power spectral analysis of nuclear medicine scans.

Authors:  E B Cargill; K J Donohoe; G Kolodny; A J Parker; P Duane
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1991

5.  Spectral optimization for dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Michaela Weigel; Sabrina V Vollmar; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

Authors:  C B Caldwell; S J Stapleton; D W Holdsworth; R A Jong; W J Weiser; G Cooke; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Effects of computing parameters and measurement locations on the estimation of 3D NPS in non-stationary MDCT images.

Authors:  Frédéric A Miéville; Gregory Bolard; Shelley Bulling; François Gudinchet; François O Bochud; François R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Effect of slice thickness on detectability in breast CT using a prewhitened matched filter and simulated mass lesions.

Authors:  Nathan J Packard; Craig K Abbey; Kai Yang; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  20 in total

1.  A Statistical Model for Rigid Image Registration Performance: The Influence of Soft-Tissue Deformation as a Confounding Noise Source.

Authors:  Michael D Ketcha; Tharindu De Silva; Runze Han; Ali Uneri; Sebastian Vogt; Gerhard Kleinszig; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Evaluation of non-Gaussian statistical properties in virtual breast phantoms.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Predrag R Bakic; David D Pokrajac; Andrew D A Maidment; Miguel P Eckstein; John M Boone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-14

3.  Task-based optimization of dedicated breast CT via Hotelling observer metrics.

Authors:  Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Noise, sampling, and the number of projections in cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Z Zhao; G J Gang; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast.

Authors:  L Chen; J M Boone; C K Abbey; J Hargreaves; C Bateni; K K Lindfors; K Yang; A Nosratieh; A Hernandez; P Gazi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images.

Authors:  Gezheng Wen; Ho-Chang Chang; Jacob Reinhold; Joseph Y Lo; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-17

7.  Classification images for localization performance in ramp-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Frank W Samuelson; Rongping Zeng; John M Boone; Miguel P Eckstein; Kyle Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Investigation of iterative image reconstruction in low-dose breast CT.

Authors:  Junguo Bian; Kai Yang; John M Boone; Xiao Han; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sean D Rose; Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Margaret M Emmons; Lawrence J Moss; Sarwat Hussain; Stephen P Baker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.