Literature DB >> 17257790

Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.

Huw R Cooper1, Brian Roberts.   

Abstract

Previous claims that auditory stream segregation occurs in cochlear implant listeners are based on limited evidence. In experiment 1, eight listeners heard tones presented in a 30-s repeating ABA-sequence, with frequencies matching the centre frequencies of the implant's 22 electrodes. Tone A always stimulated electrode 11 (centre of the array); tone B stimulated one of the others. Tone repetition times (TRTs) from 50 to 200 ms were used. Listeners reported when they heard one or two streams. The proportion of time that each sequence was reported as segregated was consistently greater with increased electrode separation. However, TRT had no significant effect, and the perceptual reversals typical of normal-hearing listeners rarely occurred. The results may reflect channel discrimination rather than stream segregation. In experiment 2, six listeners performed a pitch-ranking task using tone pairs (reference=electrode 11). Listeners reported which tone was higher in pitch (or brighter in timbre) and their confidence in the pitch judgement. Similarities were observed in the individual pattern of results for reported segregation and pitch discrimination. Many implant listeners may show little or no sign of automatic stream segregation owing to the reduced perceptual space within which sounds can differ from one another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17257790     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  18 in total

1.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simultaneous grouping in cochlear implant listeners: can abrupt changes in level be used to segregate components from a complex tone?

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-14

5.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

9.  The role of spatiotemporal and spectral cues in segregating short sound events: evidence from auditory Ternus display.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Agathe Pralus; Ruben Hermann; Fanny Cholvy; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Annie Moulin; Pascal Barone; Nicolas Grimault; Eric Truy; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.