Literature DB >> 20649221

Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Christophe Micheyl1, Michael V Keebler, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

This study measured difference limens for fundamental frequency (DLF0s) for a target harmonic complex in the presence of a simultaneous spectrally overlapping harmonic masker. The resolvability of the target harmonics was manipulated by bandpass filtering the stimuli into a low (800-2400 Hz) or high (1600-3200 Hz) spectral region, using different nominal F0s for the targets (100, 200, and 400 Hz), and different masker F0s (0, +9, or -9 semitones) relative to the target. Three different modes of masker presentation, relative to the target, were tested: ipsilateral, contralateral, and dichotic, with a higher masker level in the contralateral ear. Ipsilateral and dichotic maskers generally caused marked elevations in DLF0s compared to both the unmasked and contralateral masker conditions. Analyses based on excitation patterns revealed that ipsilaterally masked F0 difference limens were small (<2%) only when the excitation patterns evoked by the target-plus-masker mixture contained several salient (>1 dB) peaks at or close to target harmonic frequencies, even though these peaks were rarely produced by the target alone. The findings are discussed in terms of place- or place-time mechanisms of pitch perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649221      PMCID: PMC2921428          DOI: 10.1121/1.3372751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Pitch identification of simultaneous dichotic two-tone complexes.

Authors:  J G Beerends; A J Houtsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Binaural integration of melodic patterns.

Authors:  D Deutsch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-05

4.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Period histogram and product spectrum: new methods for fundamental-frequency measurement.

Authors:  M R Schroeder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Measurements of binaural echo suppression.

Authors:  P M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A central spectrum model: a synthesis of auditory-nerve timing and place cues in monaural communication of frequency spectrum.

Authors:  P Srulovicz; J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein's theory of pitch perception.

Authors:  H Duifhuis; L F Willems; R J Sluyter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Cortical pitch regions in humans respond primarily to resolved harmonics and are located in specific tonotopic regions of anterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam Norman-Haignere; Nancy Kanwisher; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of pitch and harmonic cancellation when listening to speech in harmonic background sounds.

Authors:  Daniel R Guest; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocoder Simulations Explain Complex Pitch Perception Limitations Experienced by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-21

5.  Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; David A Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-30

6.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

7.  Congenital amusia: a cognitive disorder limited to resolved harmonics and with no peripheral basis.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Andrew J Oxenham; Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Neural representation of concurrent harmonic sounds in monkey primary auditory cortex: implications for models of auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Mitchell Steinschneider; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.