Literature DB >> 18665741

Effects of context on auditory stream segregation.

Joel S Snyder1, Olivia L Carter, Suh-Kyung Lee, Erin E Hannon, Claude Alain.   

Abstract

The authors examined the effect of preceding context on auditory stream segregation. Low tones (A), high tones (B), and silences (-) were presented in an ABA- pattern. Participants indicated whether they perceived 1 or 2 streams of tones. The A tone frequency was fixed, and the B tone was the same as the A tone or had 1 of 3 higher frequencies. Perception of 2 streams in the current trial increased with greater frequency separation between the A and B tones (Delta f). Larger Delta f in previous trials modified this pattern, causing less streaming in the current trial. This occurred even when listeners were asked to bias their perception toward hearing 1 stream or 2 streams. The effect of previous Delta f was not due to response bias because simply perceiving 2 streams in the previous trial did not cause less streaming in the current trial. Finally, the effect of previous ?f was diminished, though still present, when the silent duration between trials was increased to 5.76 s. The time course of this context effect on streaming implicates the involvement of auditory sensory memory or neural adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665741     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; James Stout; Christof Koch; Olivia Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  What you hear first, is what you get: Initial metrical cue presentation modulates syllable detection in sentence processing.

Authors:  Anna Fiveash; Simone Falk; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Auditory stream segregation impairments in schizophrenia.

Authors:  David M Weintraub; Erin M Ramage; Griffin Sutton; Erik Ringdahl; Aaron Boren; Amanda C Pasinski; Nick Thaler; Michael Haderlie; Daniel N Allen; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Adaptation reveals multiple levels of representation in auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Olivia L Carter; Erin E Hannon; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

10.  Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in auditory perceptual organization.

Authors:  Aurelie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.