Literature DB >> 10573908

Waveform interactions and the segregation of concurrent vowels.

A de Cheveigné1.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the effects of small values of fundamental frequency difference (delta F0) on the identification of concurrent vowels. As delta F0's get smaller, mechanisms that exploit them must necessarily fail, and the pattern of breakdown may tell which mechanisms are used by the auditory system. Small delta F0's also present a methodological difficulty. If the stimulus is shorter than the beat period, its spectrum depends on which part of the beat pattern is sampled. A different starting phase might produce a different experimental outcome, and the experiment may lack generality. The first experiment explored the effects of delta F0's as small as 0.4%. The smallest delta F0 conditions were synthesized with several starting phases obtained by gating successive segments of the beat pattern. An improvement in identification was demonstrated for delta F0's as small as 0.4% for all segments. Differences between segments (or starting phase) were also observed, but when averaged over vowel pairs they were of small magnitude compared to delta F0 effects. The nature of delta F0-induced waveform interactions and the factors that affect them are discussed in detail in a tutorial section, and the hypothesis that the improvement in identification is the result of such interactions (beat hypothesis) is examined. It is unlikely that this hypothesis can account for the effects observed. The reduced benefit of delta F0 for identification at smaller delta F0's more likely reflects the breakdown of the same F0-guided segregation mechanism that operates at larger delta F0's.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573908     DOI: 10.1121/1.428115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: spectral dips and periodicity.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar; Christi Wise Miller
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Charles J Limb; Monita Chatterjee; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

10.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.