Literature DB >> 12430819

Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Brian Roberts1, Brian R Glasberg, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

Peripheral-channeling theorists argue that differences in excitation pattern between successive sounds are necessary for stream segregation to occur. The component phases of complex tones comprising unresolved harmonics (F0=100 Hz) were manipulated to change pitch and timbre without changing the power spectrum. In experiment 1, listeners compared two alternating sequences of tones, A and B. One sequence was isochronous (tone duration=60 ms, intertone interval=40 ms). The other began isochronously, but the progressive delay of tone B made the rhythm irregular. Subjects had to identify the sequence with irregular rhythm. Stream segregation makes this task more difficult. A and B could differ in passband (1250-2500 Hz, 1768-3536 Hz, 2500-5000 Hz), component phase (cosine, alternating, random), or both. Stimuli were presented at 70 dB SPL in pink noise. Dissimilarity in either passband or phase increased discrimination thresholds. Moreover, phase differences raised threshold even when there was no passband difference. In experiment 2, listeners judged moment-by-moment the grouping of long ABA-ABA-... sequences. The measure was the proportion of time a sequence was heard as segregated. The factors that increased segregation were very similar to those that increased threshold in experiment 1. Overall, the findings indicate that substantial stream segregation can occur without differences in power spectrum. It is concluded that differences in peripheral channeling are not a requirement for stream segregation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430819     DOI: 10.1121/1.1508784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  54 in total

1.  The effect of carrier level on tuning in amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural mechanisms of rhythmic masking release in monkey primary auditory cortex: implications for models of auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  István Winkler; Susan Denham; Robert Mill; Tamás M Bohm; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

5.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Christophe Micheyl; Jennifer R Melcher; André Rupp; Michael Scherg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Anastasios Sarampalis; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Monita Chatterjee; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.