Literature DB >> 18936520

The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography.

Xuanqin Mou1, Xi Chen, Lijun Sun, Hengyong Yu, Zhen Ji, Lei Zhang.   

Abstract

Microcalcification is one of the earliest and main indicators of breast cancer. Because dual-energy digital mammography could suppress the contrast between the adipose and glandular tissues of the breast, it is considered a promising technique that will improve the detection of microcalcification. In dual-energy digital mammography, the imaged object is a human breast, while in calibration measurements only the phantoms of breast tissue equivalent materials are available. Consequently, the differences between phantoms and breast tissues will lead to calibration phantom errors. Based on the dual-energy imaging model, formulae of calibration phantom errors are derived in this paper. Then, this type of error is quantitatively analyzed using publicly available data and compared with other types of error. The results demonstrate that the calibration phantom error is large and dominant in dual-energy mammography, seriously decreasing calculation precision. Further investigations on the physical meaning of calibration phantom error reveal that the imaged objects with the same glandular ratio have identical calibration phantom error. Finally, an error correction method is proposed based on our findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936520      PMCID: PMC2872939          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/22/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  23 in total

1.  Systematic bias in basis material decomposition applied to quantitative dual-energy x-ray imaging.

Authors:  E L Gingold; B H Hasegawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit.

Authors:  M-E Brandan; V Ramírez-R
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  An accurate method for direct dual-energy calibration and decomposition.

Authors:  H N Cardinal; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials.

Authors:  J W Byng; J G Mainprize; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; G T Barnes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results.

Authors:  P C Johns; D J Drost; M J Yaffe; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography.

Authors:  P C Johns; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography.

Authors:  L A Lehmann; R E Alvarez; A Macovski; W R Brody; N J Pelc; S J Riederer; A L Hall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis.

Authors:  J M Boone; G S Shaber; M Tecotzky
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Breast tumors: composition of microcalcifications.

Authors:  A Fandos-Morera; M Prats-Esteve; J M Tura-Soteras; A Traveria-Cros
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Measurement of breast tissue composition with dual energy cone-beam computed tomography: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Volumetric lean percentage measurement using dual energy mammography.

Authors:  Justin L Ducote; Michael J Klopfer; S Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.

Authors:  Aurelie D Laidevant; Serghei Malkov; Chris I Flowers; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Automatic and robust calibration of optical detector arrays for biomedical diffuse optical spectroscopy.

Authors:  Michael A Mastanduno; Shudong Jiang; Roberta Diflorio-Alexander; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Obtaining dual-energy computed tomography (CT) information from a single-energy CT image for quantitative imaging analysis of living subjects by using deep learning.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Tianling Lv; Rena Lee; Yang Chen; Lei Xing
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2020
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.