| Literature DB >> 31797593 |
Wei Zhao1, Tianling Lv, Rena Lee, Yang Chen, Lei Xing.
Abstract
Computed tomographic (CT) is a fundamental imaging modality to generate cross-sectional views of internal anatomy in a living subject or interrogate material composition of an object, and it has been routinely used in clinical applications and nondestructive testing. In a standard CT image, pixels having the same Hounsfield Units (HU) can correspond to different materials, and it is therefore challenging to differentiate and quantify materials. Dual-energy CT (DECT) is desirable to differentiate multiple materials, but the costly DECT scanners are not widely available as single-energy CT (SECT) scanners. Recent advancement in deep learning provides an enabling tool to map images between different modalities with incorporated prior knowledge. Here we develop a deep learning approach to perform DECT imaging by using the standard SECT data. The end point of the approach is a model capable of providing the high-energy CT image for a given input low-energy CT image. The feasibility of the deep learning-based DECT imaging method using a SECT data is demonstrated using contrast-enhanced DECT images and evaluated using clinical relevant indexes. This work opens new opportunities for numerous DECT clinical applications with a standard SECT data and may enable significantly simplified hardware design, scanning dose and image cost reduction for future DECT systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31797593 PMCID: PMC6938283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pac Symp Biocomput ISSN: 2335-6928
Fig. 1.Low- and high-energy CT images with and without noise reduction. The difference images in column three are obtained by subtracting the denoised images from the raw images. All images are displayed in (C=0HU and W=500HU).
Quantitative analysis of the DECT images with and without noise reduction. Region-of-interests (ROIs) assessments on different tissues (arota, liver, spine, and stomach) show the HU accuracy of the CT images is well preserved, while the noise is significantly reduced after noise reduction.
| ROIs | HU | HU | ΔHU | std | std | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arota | 100 kV | 314.5 | 312.7 | 1.8 | 35.4 | 6.8 |
| 140 kV | 166.7 | 164.8 | 1.9 | 33.0 | 7.6 | |
| Liver | 100 kV | 71.8 | 69.5 | 2.3 | 31.6 | 6.8 |
| 140 kV | 60.5 | 63.4 | −2.9 | 24.8 | 5.4 | |
| Spine | 100 kV | 214.6 | 214.7 | −0.1 | 39.7 | 20.7 |
| 140 kV | 149.5 | 149.0 | 0.5 | 32.2 | 13.6 | |
| Stomach | 100 kV | 2.2 | 2.6 | −0.4 | 36.7 | 8.1 |
| 140 kV | −1 | −1 | 0 | 38.8 | 7.7 | |
Fig. 2.Original low- (1st column) and high-energy (2nd column) DECT images and predicted high-energy CT images (3rd column), and difference images (4th column) between the predicted and original 140 kV images. All images are displayed in (C=0HU and W=500HU).
Fig. 3.Quantitative measurement of the 140 kV images using ROIs on spine (a), aorta (b), liver (c) and stomach (d) for different patients. The deep learning (DL) predicted images are highly consistent with the original CT images.
Fig. 4.Illustration of the contrast-enhanced 100 kV CT images (C=0HU and W=500HU) and VNC images (C=0HU and W=500HU) and iodine maps (C=0.6 and W=1.2) obtained using original DECT images and deep learning (DL)-based DECT images in transversal, coronal and sagittal views.